Creation of signatures and identification of molecular subtypes of glioblastoma based on disulfidptosis-related genes for predicting patient prognosis and immunological activity

Abstract

Background: In recent times, disulfidptosis, an intricate form of cellular demise, has garnered attention due to its impact on prognosis, tumor progression and treatment response. Nevertheless, the exact significance of disulfidptosis-related genes (DisRGs) in glioblastoma (GBM) remains enigmatic. Methods: The GEO and TCGA databases provided transcriptional and clinically relevant data on tumor samples, while the GTEx database provided data on healthy tissues. Disulfidptosis-related genes (DisRGs) were procured from previous scholarly investigations. The expression profile of DisRGs was initially scrutinized among patients diagnosed with GBM, subsequent to which their prognostic value was explored. Through consensus clustering, we constructed DisRGs-related clusters and gene subtypes. Our results established that the DisRG-related clusters had differentially expressed genes, resulting in a DisulfidptosisScore model, which had a positive prognostic value. Results: The differential expression profile of 24 DisRGs between GBM samples and healthy samples was acquired. Through consensus cluster analysis, two distinct disulfidptosis subtypes, namely DisRGcluster A and DisRGcluster B, were identified. Then, the DisulfidptosisScore model including 4 characteristic genes was constructed.Notably, patients with GBM assigned with lower score demonstrated a considerably longer overall survival (OS) compared to those with higher score. Conclusion: We have effectively devised a prognostic model associated with disulfidptosis, presenting autonomous prognostic predictions for patients with GBM. These findings serve as a valuable addition to the current comprehension of disulfidptosis and offer fresh theoretical substantiation for the development of enhanced treatment strategies.

Keywords

• Glioblastoma
• Programmed cell death
• Disulfidptosis
• Unsupervised clustering
• Risk score model