Global Ecology and Conservation (Jan 2024)

Effect of translocation on home range and movements of giant gartersnakes

  • Allison M. Nguyen,
  • Brian J. Halstead,
  • Brian D. Todd

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 49
p. e02789

Abstract

Read online

Conservation translocations are often used to connect disjunct populations or reintroduce them to otherwise suitable areas from which they have become locally extinct. Translocations, however, can alter wildlife movements and increase their exposure to hazards such as predation, thus increasing their risk of mortality. The giant gartersnake, Thamnophis gigas, is a wetland-dependent threatened species that has lost > 90% of its historical habitat. Certain species recovery may depend on the success of translocations in restoring populations. We translocated snakes from two donor sites—one managed wetland and one rice agriculture site—to a third restored wetland in Sacramento County, California, USA, to evaluate the impact of translocations on home ranges and movements. Translocated snakes had smaller home ranges after translocation for the 95% and 100% MCP estimation, had smaller net displacements, but had similar measures of sinuosity (index that measures the curvature of a movement path), total distance moved, and start-to-end distance compared to their individual measurements before translocation. Landscape type, however, had the greatest effect on home range estimates and movement measures, with resident snakes from the rice agriculture site having greater home ranges and net displacements, and greater, less sinuous seasonal movement paths than snakes from both the donor and recipient wetland sites. Results varied depending on the specific metric, but overall, translocated snakes tended to have intermediate values for home range size, movement distances, and sinuosity compared to the two resident groups. Our results suggest that although translocation did affect movement and space use relative to resident snakes, its effect depended on the donor habitat from which translocated snakes were removed. Because irregular movements are often linked to low survival after translocation, it is encouraging that translocated snakes did not move more than snakes from a donor rice agriculture site, a landscape that represents much habitat for remaining populations.

Keywords