Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control (Apr 2023)

A systematic outbreak investigation of SARS-CoV-2 transmission clusters in a tertiary academic care center

  • Matthias von Rotz,
  • Richard Kuehl,
  • Ana Durovic,
  • Sandra Zingg,
  • Anett Apitz,
  • Fanny Wegner,
  • Helena M. B. Seth-Smith,
  • Tim Roloff,
  • Karoline Leuzinger,
  • Hans H. Hirsch,
  • Sabine Kuster,
  • Manuel Battegay,
  • Luigi Mariani,
  • Stefan Schaeren,
  • Stefano Bassetti,
  • Florian Banderet-Uglioni,
  • Adrian Egli,
  • Sarah Tschudin-Sutter

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01242-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background We sought to decipher transmission pathways in healthcare-associated infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) within our hospital by epidemiological work-up and complementary whole genome sequencing (WGS). We report the findings of the four largest epidemiologic clusters of SARS-CoV-2 transmission occurring during the second wave of the pandemic from 11/2020 to 12/2020. Methods At the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, systematic outbreak investigation is initiated at detection of any nosocomial case of SARS-CoV-2 infection, as confirmed by polymerase chain reaction, occurring more than five days after admission. Clusters of nosocomial infections, defined as the detection of at least two positive patients and/or healthcare workers (HCWs) within one week with an epidemiological link, were further investigated by WGS on respective strains. Results The four epidemiologic clusters included 40 patients and 60 HCWs. Sequencing data was available for 70% of all involved cases (28 patients and 42 HCWs), confirmed epidemiologically suspected in house transmission in 33 cases (47.1% of sequenced cases) and excluded transmission in the remaining 37 cases (52.9%). Among cases with identical strains, epidemiologic work-up suggested transmission mainly through a ward-based exposure (24/33, 72.7%), more commonly affecting HCWs (16/24, 66.7%) than patients (8/24, 33.3%), followed by transmission between patients (6/33, 18.2%), and among HCWs and patients (3/33, 9.1%, respectively two HCWs and one patient). Conclusions Phylogenetic analyses revealed important insights into transmission pathways supporting less than 50% of epidemiologically suspected SARS-CoV-2 transmissions. The remainder of cases most likely reflect community-acquired infection randomly detected by outbreak investigation. Notably, most transmissions occurred between HCWs, possibly indicating lower perception of the risk of infection during contacts among HCWs.

Keywords