Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease (Jul 2024)

Neighborhood Resources and Health Outcomes Among Stroke Survivors in a Population‐Based Cohort

  • Leanna M. Delhey,
  • Xu Shi,
  • Lewis B. Morgenstern,
  • Devin L. Brown,
  • Melinda A. Smith,
  • Erin C. Case,
  • Mellanie V. Springer,
  • Lynda D. Lisabeth

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.034308
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 14

Abstract

Read online

Background Stroke survivors believe neighborhood resources such as community centers are beneficial; however, little is known about the influence of these resources on stroke outcomes. We evaluated whether residing in neighborhoods with greater resource density is associated with favorable post‐stroke outcomes. Methods and Results We included Mexican American and non‐Hispanic White stroke survivors from the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi project (2009–2019). The exposure was density of neighborhood resources (eg, community centers, restaurants, stores) within a residential census tract at stroke onset. Outcomes included time to death and recurrence, and at 3 months following stroke: disability (activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living), cognition (Modified Mini‐Mental State Exam), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire‐8), and quality of life (abbreviated Stroke‐Specific Quality of Life scale). We fit multivariable Cox regression and mixed linear models. We considered interactions with stroke severity, ethnicity, and sex. Among 1786 stroke survivors, median age was 64 years (interquartile range, 56–73), 55% men, and 62% Mexican American. Resource density was not associated with death, recurrence, or depression. Greater resource density (75th versus 25th percentile) was associated with more favorable cognition (Modified Mini‐Mental State Exam mean difference=0.838, 95% CI=0.092, 1.584) and among moderate–severe stroke survivors, with more favorable functioning (activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living=−0.156 [95% CI, −0.284 to 0.027]) and quality of life (abbreviated Stroke‐Specific Quality of Life scale=0.194 [95% CI, 0.029–0.359]). Conclusions We observed associations between greater resource density and cognition overall and with functioning and quality of life among moderate–severe stroke survivors. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine if neighborhood resources may be a tool for recovery.

Keywords