Frontiers in Psychology (Jun 2024)

Individual differences in intracortical inhibition predict action control when facing emotional stimuli

  • Thomas Quettier,
  • Giuseppe Ippolito,
  • Giuseppe Ippolito,
  • Lorenzo Però,
  • Pasquale Cardellicchio,
  • Simone Battaglia,
  • Simone Battaglia,
  • Sara Borgomaneri

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1391723
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

Efficient inhibitory control in the context of prepotent actions is vital. However, such action inhibition may be profoundly influenced by affective states. Interestingly, research indicates that action control can be either impaired or improved by emotional stimuli. Thus, a great deal of confusion surrounds our knowledge of the complex dynamics subtending emotions and action control. Here, we aimed to investigate whether negative stimuli, even when non-consciously presented and task-irrelevant, can affect action control relative to neutral stimuli. Additionally, we tested whether individual differences in intracortical excitability may predict action control capabilities. To address these issues, we asked participants to complete a modified version of the Stop Signal Task (SST) in which fearful or neutral stimuli were subliminally presented before the go signals as primes. Moreover, we assessed participants’ resting-state corticospinal excitability, short intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF). Results demonstrated better action control capabilities when fearful stimuli were subliminally presented and interindividual SICI predicted stronger action inhibition capabilities. Taken together, these results shed new light on the intricate dynamics between action, consciousness, and motor control, suggesting that intracortical measures can be used as potential biomarkers of reduced motor inhibition in research and clinical settings.

Keywords