Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics (Jul 2024)

Component rotational mismatch in the standing position is a potential risk factor for unfavourable functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty

  • Yasuhiko Kokubu,
  • Shinya Kawahara,
  • Hideki Mizu‐Uchi,
  • Satoshi Hamai,
  • Yukio Akasaki,
  • Taishi Sato,
  • Shojiro Ishibashi,
  • Toshiki Konishi,
  • Yasuharu Nakashima

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.12069
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 3
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose This study assessed rotational mismatch between components after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the supine and standing positions and aimed to investigate the effect of rotational mismatch in the standing position on postoperative patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods Seventy‐one patients (71 knees) who underwent TKA for medial knee osteoarthritis were used to investigate rotational mismatches between components. Rotational mismatches between components were examined on postoperative standing whole‐leg and supine knee radiographs using a three‐dimensional‐to‐two‐dimensional model image registration technique, and the angles between the reference axes of the components were measured. Component alignment was evaluated using postoperative computed tomography images, and a questionnaire (2011 version of the Knee Society Score: [KSS 2011]) was mailed to investigate postoperative PROMs. Results In the entire cohort, rotational mismatches in the supine and standing positions were similar (p = 0.9315). In 15% of patients, the mismatch was large (>5°) in the supine position but small (5°) in the standing position (underestimated group). The underestimated group had severe preoperative varus deformity, resulting in external rotation of both femoral and tibial components. Rotational mismatch in the standing position (p = 0.0032) was a significant risk factor for unfavourable PROMs. Patients with a mismatch in the standing position had significantly lower scores than those without a mismatch (p = 0.0215), exceeding the minimal clinically important difference values. Conclusions The underestimated group is clinically important because the surgical procedure and intraoperative assessment of component placement are performed in the supine position. In cases of severe preoperative varus deformity, care should be taken not to place the component in malrotation to avoid rotational mismatch in the standing position. Level of Evidence Ⅳ, Case series.

Keywords