Guoji Yanke Zazhi (Sep 2017)

Clinical study on the treatment of lacrimal duct obstruction with lomefloxacin hydrochloride eye ophthalmic gel

  • Xiang-Fu Cheng,
  • Yue-Juan Zhao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2017.9.51
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 9
pp. 1793 – 1795

Abstract

Read online

AIM: To study the clinical effect of silica gel drainage tube combined with lomefloxacin hydrochloride eye ophthalmic gel in the treatment of lacrimal duct obstruction.METHODS: Totally 86 cases(138 eyes)of lacrimal duct embolism treated in our hospital from February to December 2015 were divided into 43 cases(68 eyes)as control group and 43 cases(70 eyes)of the observation group according to whether they were treated with lomefloxacin hydrochloride eye ophthalmic gel. Patients in the control group were treated with silica gel drainage, while the observation group was treated with lomefloxacin hydrochloride eye ophthalmic gel on the basis of the control group. The total effective rate, serum hypersensitivity C-reactive protein(h-CRP)level, complications and recurrence rate were observed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The total effective rate in the patients with obstructive nasolacrimal duct, common lacrimal duct obstruction, and lacrimal duct obstruction in observation group were 95.2%, 100.0%, 96.7%, higher than those in control group(PP>0.05). The serum levels of h-CRP in patients in the observation group at 3d and 7d after operation respectively were 2.40±0.84g/mL, 1.94±0.84g/mL, lower than those of control group at the same time(PPPCONCLUSION: The combination of silica gel drainage tube and lomefloxacin hydrochloride eye ophthalmic gel in the treatment of obstruction of lacrimal duct has good clinical efficacy, low inflammatory reaction, low complication rate and low recurrence rate.

Keywords