Scientific Reports (Apr 2022)

Separation of U87 glioblastoma cell-derived small and medium extracellular vesicles using elasto-inertial flow focusing (a spiral channel)

  • Farhad Shiri,
  • Haidong Feng,
  • Kevin E. Petersen,
  • Himanshu Sant,
  • Gina T. Bardi,
  • Luke A. Schroeder,
  • Michael L. Merchant,
  • Bruce K. Gale,
  • Joshua L. Hood

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10129-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Nanoscale and microscale cell-derived extracellular vesicle types and subtypes are of significant interest to researchers in biology and medicine. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have diagnostic and therapeutic potential in terms of biomarker and nanomedicine applications. To enable such applications, EVs must be isolated from biological fluids or separated from other EV types. Developing methods to fractionate EVs is of great importance to EV researchers. Our goal was to begin to develop a device that would separate medium EVs (mEVs, traditionally termed microvesicles or shedding vesicles) and small EVs (sEVs, traditionally termed exosomes) by elasto-inertial effect. We sought to develop a miniaturized technology that works similar to and provides the benefits of differential ultracentrifugation but is more suitable for EV-based microfluidic applications. The aim of this study was to determine whether we could use elasto-inertial focusing to re-isolate and recover U87 mEVs and sEVs from a mixture of mEVs and sEVs isolated initially by one round of differential ultracentrifugation. The studied spiral channel device can continuously process 5 ml of sample fluid per hour. Using the channel, sEVs and mEVs were recovered and re-isolated from a mixture of U87 glioma cell-derived mEVs and sEVs pre-isolated by one round of differential ultracentrifugation. Following two passes through the spiral channel, approximately 55% of sEVs were recovered with 6% contamination by mEVs (the recovered sEVs contained 6% of the total mEVs). In contrast, recovery of U87 mEVs and sEVs re-isolated using a typical second centrifugation wash step was only 8% and 53%, respectively. The spiral channel also performed similar to differential ultracentrifugation in reisolating sEVs while significantly improving mEV reisolation from a mixture of U87 sEVs and mEVs. Ultimately this technology can also be coupled to other microfluidic EV isolation methods in series and/or parallel to improve isolation and minimize loss of EV subtypes.