[18F]-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine (FET) in glioblastoma (FIG) TROG 18.06 study: protocol for a prospective, multicentre PET/CT trial
Eng-Siew Koh,
Mustafa Khasraw,
Elizabeth H Barnes,
Kyle M Walsh,
Mark Rosenthal,
Rodney J Hicks,
Farshad Foroudi,
Hui K Gan,
Anna K Nowak,
Dale L Bailey,
Paul Roach,
Arian Lasocki,
Robyn Leonard,
Roel Verhaak,
Andrew M Scott,
Alisha Moore,
Bradford A Moffat,
Clare Senko,
Roslyn J Francis,
Martin Ebert,
Sze Ting Lee,
Eddie Lau,
Greg Fitt,
Robert Coffey,
Richard De Abreu Lourenco,
Lucas Adda,
Paul A Thomas,
Michael Back
Affiliations
Eng-Siew Koh
20 Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
Mustafa Khasraw
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Elizabeth H Barnes
University of Sydney, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
Kyle M Walsh
1 Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Mark Rosenthal
School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Rodney J Hicks
Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Farshad Foroudi
Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Hui K Gan
Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Anna K Nowak
3 Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
Dale L Bailey
Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
Paul Roach
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
Arian Lasocki
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Robyn Leonard
Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Roel Verhaak
Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Andrew M Scott
School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Alisha Moore
Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG), Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Bradford A Moffat
Melbourne Brain Centre Imaging Unit, Department of Radiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Clare Senko
Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Roslyn J Francis
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
Martin Ebert
Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Sze Ting Lee
School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Eddie Lau
Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Greg Fitt
Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Robert Coffey
Epithelial Biology Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Richard De Abreu Lourenco
Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia
Lucas Adda
The Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology (COGNO) Consumer Advisor Panel, National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre (CTC), University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Paul A Thomas
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Michael Back
Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
Introduction Glioblastoma is the most common aggressive primary central nervous system cancer in adults characterised by uniformly poor survival. Despite maximal safe resection and postoperative radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide-based chemotherapy, tumours inevitably recur. Imaging with O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography (PET) has the potential to impact adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) planning, distinguish between treatment-induced pseudoprogression versus tumour progression as well as prognostication.Methods and analysis The FET-PET in Glioblastoma (FIG) study is a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, phase II study across 10 Australian sites and will enrol up to 210 adults aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. FET-PET will be performed at up to three time points: (1) following initial surgery and prior to commencement of chemoradiation (FET-PET1); (2) 4 weeks following concurrent chemoradiation (FET-PET2); and (3) within 14 days of suspected clinical and/or radiological progression on MRI (performed at the time of clinical suspicion of tumour recurrence) (FET-PET3). The co-primary outcomes are: (1) to investigate how FET-PET versus standard MRI impacts RT volume delineation and (2) to determine the accuracy and management impact of FET-PET in distinguishing pseudoprogression from true tumour progression. The secondary outcomes are: (1) to investigate the relationships between FET-PET parameters (including dynamic uptake, tumour to background ratio, metabolic tumour volume) and progression-free survival and overall survival; (2) to assess the change in blood and tissue biomarkers determined by serum assay when comparing FET-PET data acquired prior to chemoradiation with other prognostic markers, looking at the relationships of FET-PET versus MRI-determined site/s of progressive disease post chemotherapy treatment with MRI and FET-PET imaging; and (3) to estimate the health economic impact of incorporating FET-PET into glioblastoma management and in the assessment of post-treatment pseudoprogression or recurrence/true progression. Exploratory outcomes include the correlation of multimodal imaging, blood and tumour biomarker analyses with patterns of failure and survival.Ethics and dissemination The study protocol V.2.0 dated 20 November 2020 has been approved by a lead Human Research Ethics Committee (Austin Health, Victoria). Other clinical sites will provide oversight through local governance processes, including obtaining informed consent from suitable participants. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Results of the FIG study (TROG 18.06) will be disseminated via relevant scientific and consumer forums and peer-reviewed publications.Trial registration number ANZCTR ACTRN12619001735145