Cadernos de Saúde (Dec 2009)

Phonological category resolution: a study of handshapes in younger and older sign languages

  • Assaf Israel,
  • Wendy Sandler

DOI
https://doi.org/10.34632/cadernosdesaude.2009.2929
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. Especial

Abstract

Read online

The existence of a phonological system – a system of meaningless building blocks that make up meaningful words – is often considered a prerequisite for language, and the discovery that sign languages used by deaf people have a meaningless level of structure convinced linguists that they are real languages. But the question of how a phonological system arises has not previously been addressed, since all spoken languages are old or descended from old languages, and most sign languages that have been studied have also been around for some time. The present study is a step toward documentation of the formation of phonological categories in a new sign language, Al-Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language (ABSL), which arose recently in an insular community with a high incidence of deafness. The work is motivated by the observation that this new language appears to exhibit a good deal of cross-signer variation in the formation of signs (Aronoff et al 2008). To put this observation to the test, we measure the amount of variation across 10 signers in the production of one phonological category – handshape – in 15 signs of ABSL, and compare it with handshape production in two other, more established sign languages: Israeli Sign Language (ISL) and American Sign Language (ASL). Our methodology measures the degree of cross-signer consensus with respect to each meaningless phonetic feature of handshape as well as the number of variants (indicating the range of variation), and reveals a consistent pattern across the three languages: The largest amount of variation is found in ABSL; ISL is next; and ASL shows the least amount of cross-signer variation in production of the handshape category. These results suggest that phonological categories are still in the process of being formed in the new language, and we appeal to a combination of historical and social factors to explain this ABSL > ISL > ASL cline. The findings and analysis offer a glimpse into the development of phonological categories in a new language.

Keywords