Biogeosciences (Jan 2013)

Carbon dioxide balance of subarctic tundra from plot to regional scales

  • M. E. Marushchak,
  • I. Kiepe,
  • C. Biasi,
  • V. Elsakov,
  • T. Friborg,
  • T. Johansson,
  • H. Soegaard,
  • T. Virtanen,
  • P. J. Martikainen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-437-2013
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
pp. 437 – 452

Abstract

Read online

We report here the carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) budget of a 98.6 km<sup>2</sup> subarctic tundra area in northeast European Russia based on measurements at two different scales and two independent upscaling approaches. Plot-scale measurements (chambers on terrestrial surfaces, gas gradient method and bubble collectors on lakes) were carried out from July 2007 to October 2008. The landscape-scale eddy covariance (EC) measurements covered the snow-free period of 2008. The annual net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of different land cover types ranged from &minus;251 to 84 g C m<sup>−2</sup>. Leaf area index (LAI) was an excellent predictor of the spatial variability in gross photosynthesis (GP), NEE and ecosystem respiration (ER). The plot-scale CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes were first scaled up to the EC source area and then to the whole study area using two data sets: a land cover classification and a LAI map, both based on field data and a 2.4 m pixel-sized QuickBird satellite image. The good agreement of the CO<sub>2</sub> balances for the EC footprint based on the different measuring techniques (&minus;105 to &minus;81 g C m<sup>−2</sup> vs. &minus;79 g C m<sup>−2</sup>; growing season 2008) justified the integration of the plot-scale measurements over the larger area. The regional CO<sub>2</sub> balance based on area-integrated plot-scale measurements was &minus;41 or &minus;79 g C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> according to the two upscaling methods, the land cover classification and the LAI map, respectively. Due to the heterogeneity of tundra, the effect of climate change on CO<sub>2</sub> uptake will vary strongly according to the land cover type and, moreover, likely changes in their relative coverage in the future will have great impact on the regional CO<sub>2</sub> balance.