Applied Sciences (Aug 2021)

Interactive Machine Learning-Based Multi-Label Segmentation of Solid Tumors and Organs

  • Dimitrios Bounias,
  • Ashish Singh,
  • Spyridon Bakas,
  • Sarthak Pati,
  • Saima Rathore,
  • Hamed Akbari,
  • Michel Bilello,
  • Benjamin A. Greenberger,
  • Joseph Lombardo,
  • Rhea D. Chitalia,
  • Nariman Jahani,
  • Aimilia Gastounioti,
  • Michelle Hershman,
  • Leonid Roshkovan,
  • Sharyn I. Katz,
  • Bardia Yousefi,
  • Carolyn Lou,
  • Amber L. Simpson,
  • Richard K. G. Do,
  • Russell T. Shinohara,
  • Despina Kontos,
  • Konstantina Nikita,
  • Christos Davatzikos

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167488
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 16
p. 7488

Abstract

Read online

We seek the development and evaluation of a fast, accurate, and consistent method for general-purpose segmentation, based on interactive machine learning (IML). To validate our method, we identified retrospective cohorts of 20 brain, 50 breast, and 50 lung cancer patients, as well as 20 spleen scans, with corresponding ground truth annotations. Utilizing very brief user training annotations and the adaptive geodesic distance transform, an ensemble of SVMs is trained, providing a patient-specific model applied to the whole image. Two experts segmented each cohort twice with our method and twice manually. The IML method was faster than manual annotation by 53.1% on average. We found significant (p IML/DiceManual = 0.91/0.87), breast tumors (DiceIML/DiceManual = 0.84/0.82), and lung nodules (DiceIML/DiceManual = 0.78/0.83). For intra-rater consistency, a significant (p = 0.003) difference was found for spleen (DiceIML/DiceManual = 0.91/0.89). For inter-rater consistency, significant (p IML/DiceManual = 0.91/0.87), breast (DiceIML/DiceManual = 0.86/0.81), lung (DiceIML/DiceManual = 0.85/0.89), the non-enhancing (DiceIML/DiceManual = 0.79/0.67) and the enhancing (DiceIML/DiceManual = 0.79/0.84) brain tumor sub-regions, which, in aggregation, favored our method. Quantitative evaluation for speed, spatial overlap, and consistency, reveals the benefits of our proposed method when compared with manual annotation, for several clinically relevant problems. We publicly release our implementation through CaPTk (Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit) and as an MITK plugin.

Keywords