Respiratory Research (Aug 2022)

Efficacy and safety of the investigational complement C5 inhibitor zilucoplan in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: an open-label randomized controlled trial

  • Elisabeth De Leeuw,
  • Karel F. A. Van Damme,
  • Jozefien Declercq,
  • Cedric Bosteels,
  • Bastiaan Maes,
  • Simon J. Tavernier,
  • Laurent Detalle,
  • Trevor Smart,
  • Sophie Glatt,
  • Nincy Debeuf,
  • Julie Deckers,
  • Sahine Lameire,
  • Stefaan J. Vandecasteele,
  • Nikolaas De Neve,
  • Ingel K. Demedts,
  • Elke Govaerts,
  • Christiane Knoop,
  • Karolien Vanhove,
  • Michel Moutschen,
  • Wim Terryn,
  • Pieter Depuydt,
  • Eva Van Braeckel,
  • Filomeen Haerynck,
  • Tine C. J. Hendrickx,
  • Vanessa Parrein,
  • Marianna Lalla,
  • Claire Brittain,
  • Bart N. Lambrecht

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02126-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The efficacy and safety of complement inhibition in COVID-19 patients is unclear. Methods A multicenter randomized controlled, open-label trial. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with signs of systemic inflammation and hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 below 350 mmHg) were randomized (2:1 ratio) to receive standard of care with or without the C5 inhibitor zilucoplan daily for 14 days, under antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was improvement in oxygenation at day 6 and 15. Results 81 patients were randomly assigned to zilucoplan (n = 55) or the control group (n = 26). 78 patients were included in the safety and primary analysis. Most were men (87%) and the median age was 63 years. The mean improvement in PaO2/FiO2 from baseline to day 6 was 56.4 mmHg in the zilucoplan group and 20.6 mmHg in the control group (mean difference + 35.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) − 9.4 to 80.9; p = 0.12), an effect also observed at day 15. Day 28 mortality was 9% in the zilucoplan and 21% in the control group (odds ratio 0.4; 95% CI 0.1 to 1.5). At long-term follow up, the distance walked in a 6-min test was 539.7 m in zilucoplan and 490.6 m in the control group (p = 0.18). Zilucoplan lowered serum C5b-9 (p < 0.001) and interleukin-8 (p = 0.03) concentration compared with control. No relevant safety differences between the zilucoplan and control group were identified. Conclusion Administration of zilucoplan to COVID-19 patients in this proof-of-concept randomized trial was well tolerated under antibiotic prophylaxis. While not reaching statistical significance, indicators of respiratory function (PaO2/FiO2) and clinical outcome (mortality and 6-min walk test) suggest that C5 inhibition might be beneficial, although this requires further research in larger randomized studies.

Keywords