Annals of Surgery Open (Mar 2023)

A Cost Overview of Minimally Invasive Total Mesorectal Excision in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Population-based Cohort in Experienced Centres

  • Bo Smalbroek, MD,
  • Ritchie Geitenbeek, MD,
  • Thijs Burghgraef, MD,
  • Lea Dijksman, PhD,
  • Jeroen Hol, MD, PhD,
  • Marieke Rutgers, MD,
  • Rogier Crolla, MD, PhD,
  • Nanette van Geloven, MD, PhD,
  • Jeroen Leijtens, MD,
  • Fatih Polat, MD,
  • Apollo Pronk, MD, PhD,
  • Emiel Verdaasdonk, MD, PhD,
  • Jurriaan Tuynman, MD, PhD,
  • Colin Sietses, MD, PhD,
  • Maarten Postma, PhD,
  • Roel Hompes, MD, PhD,
  • Esther Consten, MD, PhD,
  • Anke Smits, MD, PhD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000263
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 1
p. e263

Abstract

Read online

Background:. Total mesorectal excision has been the gold standard for the operative management of rectal cancer. The most frequently used minimally invasive techniques for surgical resection of rectal cancer are laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and transanal total mesorectal excision. As studies comparing the costs of the techniques are lacking, this study aims to provide a cost overview. Method:. This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent total mesorectal resection between 2015 and 2017 at 11 dedicated centers, which completed the learning curve of the specific technique. The primary outcome was total in-hospital costs of each technique up to 30 days after surgery including all major surgical cost drivers, while taking into account different team approaches in the transanal approach. Secondary outcomes were hospitalization and complication rates. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariable linear regression analysis. Results:. In total, 949 patients were included, consisting of 446 laparoscopic (47%), 306 (32%) robot-assisted, and 197 (21%) transanal total mesorectal excisions. Total costs were significantly higher for transanal and robot-assisted techniques compared to the laparoscopic technique, with median (interquartile range) for laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and transanal at €10,556 (8,642;13,829), €12,918 (11,196;16,223), and € 13,052 (11,330;16,358), respectively (P < 0.001). Also, the one-team transanal approach showed significant higher operation time and higher costs compared to the two-team approach. Length of stay and postoperative complications did not differ between groups. Conclusion:. Transanal and robot-assisted approaches show higher costs during 30-day follow-up compared to laparoscopy with comparable short-term clinical outcomes. Two-team transanal approach is associated with lower total costs compared to the transanal one-team approach.