Scientific Reports (Sep 2024)

Multidisciplinary assessment of seasonal ground displacements at the Hatfield Moors gas storage site in a peat bog landscape

  • Gabriele Fibbi,
  • Alessandro Novellino,
  • Luke Bateson,
  • Riccardo Fanti,
  • Matteo Del Soldato

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73548-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 17

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The study aims to analyse ground displacement conditions observed over an Underground Gas Storage (UGS) site located at Hatfield Moors (United Kingdom), with a focus on understanding its implications for decarbonization efforts. The location serves as an active onshore storage site and was used as an analogy to assess ground motion implications around Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) by the British Geological Survey (BGS) as part of the SENSE (Assuring integrity of CO2 storage sites through ground surface monitoring) project. Given the value of continuous and real-time monitoring of ground movements induced by gas storage activities, the study leverages satellite Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data to assess the environmental impact of UGS operations. Using free and open-source Sentinel-1 satellite data, ground motion patterns over Hatfield Moors are analysed, highlighting displacements ranging from − 5.0 to -10.0 mm/year within the peat bog. In addition, the Time Series (TS) of ground displacement from January 2018 to December 2022 reveals a seasonality in ground motion, with uplift observed in late winter and subsidence in late summer, showing a periodicity of approximately 1 year and a magnitude of +/-10.0 mm. Through in-depth analysis, the study highlights the need to understand the underlying causes of ground fluctuations at gas storage sites. This paper shows that InSAR has the versatility to integrate seamlessly with different monitoring tools and methodologies, opening avenues for comprehensive and holistic analyses. Cross-correlation analyses further elucidate temporal relationships between different datasets by evaluating InSAR time series, UGS injection/withdrawal data and piezometric data. This involves decomposing the TS into distinct components, including trend, seasonality and residuals. The case of Hatfield Moors shows a significant discrepancy between the UGS data and the InSAR TS, while also demonstrating a clear correlation between the groundwater data and the InSAR TS. By integrating insights from geology, hydrology and remote sensing technologies, the study navigates the complexities inherent in areas of overlapping phenomena. Accurate interpretation is essential for informed decision making, particularly at sites such as Hatfield Moors, where the convergence of natural peat motion and storage operations highlights the need for interdisciplinary analysis to understand the underlying causes of ground fluctuation.