Journal of Ophthalmology (Jan 2020)

Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Properties between Post-LASIK Ectasia and Primary Keratoconus

  • Wuxiao Zhao,
  • Yang Shen,
  • Weijun Jian,
  • Jianmin Shang,
  • Vishal Jhanji,
  • Aruma Aruma,
  • Xingtao Zhou

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5291485
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2020

Abstract

Read online

Purpose. To compare the corneal biomechanical properties between post-LASIK ectasia and primary keratoconus. Methods. A total of 42 eyes of 42 patients with matching age and central corneal thickness (CCT) were divided into two groups according to diagnosis of post-LASIK ectasia (PLE group; n = 21; age range: 22–47 years) and primary keratoconus (KC group; n = 21; age range: 21–47 years). The corneal biomechanical properties were assessed using Scheimpflug-based technology (Corvis ST; Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany). The paired t-test and linear regression analysis were performed. Results. The PLE group had significantly higher mean stiffness parameter at the first applanation (SP-A1; 76.65 ± 21.66 vs 52.72 ± 13.65, p≤0.001) and mean stress-strain index (SSI) (SSI: 0.78 ± 0.16 versus 0.64 ± 0.12, p=0.001) than the KC group. SP-A1 was positively correlated with CCT in the PLE group (Pearson’s r = 0.816, p≤0.001), but not in the KC group (Pearson’s r = −0.014, p=0.952). No statistical correlation was observed between SSI and CCT in either group (Pearson’s r = 0.292, p=0.199, and Pearson’s r = 0.004, p=0.985, respectively). Conclusions. In our case series, KC manifested more severe than PLE in biomechanical properties. Since SSI measurements were independent of corneal thickness, it can be used for corneal biomechanical assessment.