Scientific Reports (Jun 2024)

Predicting chronic wasting disease in white-tailed deer at the county scale using machine learning

  • Md Sohel Ahmed,
  • Brenda J. Hanley,
  • Corey I. Mitchell,
  • Rachel C. Abbott,
  • Nicholas A. Hollingshead,
  • James G. Booth,
  • Joe Guinness,
  • Christopher S. Jennelle,
  • Florian H. Hodel,
  • Carlos Gonzalez-Crespo,
  • Christopher R. Middaugh,
  • Jennifer R. Ballard,
  • Bambi Clemons,
  • Charlie H. Killmaster,
  • Tyler M. Harms,
  • Joe N. Caudell,
  • Kathryn M. Benavidez Westrich,
  • Emily McCallen,
  • Christine Casey,
  • Lindsey M. O’Brien,
  • Jonathan K. Trudeau,
  • Chad Stewart,
  • Michelle Carstensen,
  • William T. McKinley,
  • Kevin P. Hynes,
  • Ashley E. Stevens,
  • Landon A. Miller,
  • Merril Cook,
  • Ryan T. Myers,
  • Jonathan Shaw,
  • Michael J. Tonkovich,
  • James D. Kelly,
  • Daniel M. Grove,
  • Daniel J. Storm,
  • Krysten L. Schuler

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65002-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Continued spread of chronic wasting disease (CWD) through wild cervid herds negatively impacts populations, erodes wildlife conservation, drains resource dollars, and challenges wildlife management agencies. Risk factors for CWD have been investigated at state scales, but a regional model to predict locations of new infections can guide increasingly efficient surveillance efforts. We predicted CWD incidence by county using CWD surveillance data depicting white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in 16 eastern and midwestern US states. We predicted the binary outcome of CWD-status using four machine learning models, utilized five-fold cross-validation and grid search to pinpoint the best model, then compared model predictions against the subsequent year of surveillance data. Cross validation revealed that the Light Boosting Gradient model was the most reliable predictor given the regional data. The predictive model could be helpful for surveillance planning. Predictions of false positives emphasize areas that warrant targeted CWD surveillance because of similar conditions with counties known to harbor CWD. However, disagreements in positives and negatives between the CWD Prediction Web App predictions and the on-the-ground surveillance data one year later underscore the need for state wildlife agency professionals to use a layered modeling approach to ensure robust surveillance planning. The CWD Prediction Web App is at https://cwd-predict.streamlit.app/ .