Global Heart (Sep 2022)

WHO Non-Lab-Based CVD Risk Assessment: A Reliable Measure in a North Indian Population

  • P. Ananda Selva Das,
  • Mahasweta Dubey,
  • Ravneet Kaur,
  • Harshal Ramesh Salve,
  • Cherian Varghese,
  • Baridalyne Nongkynrih

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1148
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Timely, affordable, and sustained interventions reduce the risk of heart attack or Stroke in people with a high total risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Risk prediction tools are available to estimate the cardiovascular risk using information on multiple variables. CVD risk charts prepared by the World Health Organization (WHO) has laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based charts with the latter meant for use in resource limited settings. We conducted a study to determine concordance between the laboratory- and non-laboratory risk charts and to estimate the prevalence of selected CVD risk factors in a rural Indian population. Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in rural area of Ballabgarh in district Faridabad, Haryana. Sample of 1,018 participants aged 30–69 years was selected randomly from study area. Information on CVDs risk factors was obtained using WHO STEPS questionnaire, anthropometry and laboratory investigation. Risk distribution among the study participants was observed. Concordance between laboratory- and non-laboratory-based WHO CVD risk charts was determined using agreement analysis. Results: The mean age of the study participants was 43.9 (8.9) years and 55.6% participants were women. Among various CVD risk factors, hypertension (39.4%) was the major factor followed by overweight (34.1%) was found to be major factor, followed by current smoking (23.6%) and hypercholesterolemia (18.7%). The concordance between the two charts was 83.3% with kappa value of 0.64. Considering laboratory-based charts as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of non-laboratory-based risk charts at 5% risk as cut-off was 86.5% and 90.3% respectively. Conclusion: The study shows a good agreement between the laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based risk charts. Thus non-laboratory-based risk charts are suitable for risk estimation of CVDs for use in resource limited settings like India.

Keywords