Strengthening personalized norm feedback interventions: The ambivalent-attitude effect

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of induced attitude ambivalence on the relationship between the personalized norm feedback (PNF) intervention and heavy drinking by college students. College students consume more alcohol and engage in binge drinking at greater rates than most segments of the population. Given the harmful effects of binge drinking and other risky drinking behaviors, it is important to implement effective interventions to reduce alcohol consumption. PNF is an effective intervention for reducing heavy drinking where students compare their drinking and perceptions of normative drinking with actual drinking norms. Past research suggests that inducing ambivalence makes norms a stronger predictor of behavior. We hypothesized that induced attitudinal ambivalence before the PNF intervention would lower intentions to consume alcohol. This study was a one-way design with ambivalence about drinking (high vs low) as the independent variable and intentions to drink alcohol in the future as the dependent variable (N = 338, 76 % female, Mage = 19.76, SD = 2.61). All participants received the PNF intervention after the ambivalence manipulation and before the intentions to drink alcohol measure. Results from the generalized linear model revealed a significant effect for ambivalence, p =.028. As predicted, participants in the high ambivalence condition intended to drink fewer drinks in one sitting in the future compared to those in the low ambivalence condition. These results suggest that ambivalence may play an important role in make PNF interventions more effective, though more research is necessary to untangle the relationship between ambivalence and norms.

Keywords

• Personalized Normative Feedback
• Ambivalence
• Alcohol
• Norms
• College