BMC Medical Education (May 2024)

The Ottawa resident observation form for nurses (O-RON): evaluation of an assessment tool’s psychometric properties in different specialties

  • Hedva Chiu,
  • Timothy J. Wood,
  • Adam Garber,
  • Samantha Halman,
  • Janelle Rekman,
  • Wade Gofton,
  • Nancy Dudek

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05476-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Workplace-based assessment (WBA) used in post-graduate medical education relies on physician supervisors’ feedback. However, in a training environment where supervisors are unavailable to assess certain aspects of a resident’s performance, nurses are well-positioned to do so. The Ottawa Resident Observation Form for Nurses (O-RON) was developed to capture nurses’ assessment of trainee performance and results have demonstrated strong evidence for validity in Orthopedic Surgery. However, different clinical settings may impact a tool’s performance. This project studied the use of the O-RON in three different specialties at the University of Ottawa. Methods O-RON forms were distributed on Internal Medicine, General Surgery, and Obstetrical wards at the University of Ottawa over nine months. Validity evidence related to quantitative data was collected. Exit interviews with nurse managers were performed and content was thematically analyzed. Results 179 O-RONs were completed on 30 residents. With four forms per resident, the ORON’s reliability was 0.82. Global judgement response and frequency of concerns was correlated (r = 0.627, P < 0.001). Conclusions Consistent with the original study, the findings demonstrated strong evidence for validity. However, the number of forms collected was less than expected. Exit interviews identified factors impacting form completion, which included clinical workloads and interprofessional dynamics.

Keywords