Molecular Cancer (May 2024)

Molecular classification and biomarkers of outcome with immunotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: analyses of the CASPIAN phase 3 study

  • Mingchao Xie,
  • Miljenka Vuko,
  • Jaime Rodriguez-Canales,
  • Johannes Zimmermann,
  • Markus Schick,
  • Cathy O’Brien,
  • Luis Paz-Ares,
  • Jonathan W. Goldman,
  • Marina Chiara Garassino,
  • Carl M. Gay,
  • John V. Heymach,
  • Haiyi Jiang,
  • J. Carl Barrett,
  • Ross A. Stewart,
  • Zhongwu Lai,
  • Lauren A. Byers,
  • Charles M. Rudin,
  • Yashaswi Shrestha

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-024-02014-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 17

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background We explored potential predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy response in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treated with durvalumab (D) + tremelimumab (T) + etoposide-platinum (EP), D + EP, or EP in the randomized phase 3 CASPIAN trial. Methods 805 treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC were randomized (1:1:1) to receive D + T + EP, D + EP, or EP. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Patients were required to provide an archived tumor tissue block (or ≥ 15 newly cut unstained slides) at screening, if these samples existed. After assessment for programmed cell death ligand-1 expression and tissue tumor mutational burden, residual tissue was used for additional molecular profiling including by RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Results In 182 patients with transcriptional molecular subtyping, OS with D ± T + EP was numerically highest in the SCLC-inflamed subtype (n = 10, median 24.0 months). Patients derived benefit from immunotherapy across subtypes; thus, additional biomarkers were investigated. OS benefit with D ± T + EP versus EP was greater with high versus low CD8A expression/CD8 cell density by immunohistochemistry, but with no additional benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP. OS benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP was associated with high expression of CD4 (median 25.9 vs. 11.4 months) and antigen-presenting and processing machinery (25.9 vs. 14.6 months) and MHC I and II (23.6 vs. 17.3 months) gene signatures, and with higher MHC I expression by immunohistochemistry. Conclusions These findings demonstrate the tumor microenvironment is important in mediating better outcomes with D ± T + EP in ES-SCLC, with canonical immune markers associated with hypothesized immunotherapy mechanisms of action defining patient subsets that respond to D ± T. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043872.

Keywords