Environmental Research Letters (Jan 2018)
Evapotranspiration simulations in ISIMIP2a—Evaluation of spatio-temporal characteristics with a comprehensive ensemble of independent datasets
- Richard Wartenburger,
- Sonia I Seneviratne,
- Martin Hirschi,
- Jinfeng Chang,
- Philippe Ciais,
- Delphine Deryng,
- Joshua Elliott,
- Christian Folberth,
- Simon N Gosling,
- Lukas Gudmundsson,
- Alexandra-Jane Henrot,
- Thomas Hickler,
- Akihiko Ito,
- Nikolay Khabarov,
- Hyungjun Kim,
- Guoyong Leng,
- Junguo Liu,
- Xingcai Liu,
- Yoshimitsu Masaki,
- Catherine Morfopoulos,
- Christoph Müller,
- Hannes Müller Schmied,
- Kazuya Nishina,
- Rene Orth,
- Yadu Pokhrel,
- Thomas A M Pugh,
- Yusuke Satoh,
- Sibyll Schaphoff,
- Erwin Schmid,
- Justin Sheffield,
- Tobias Stacke,
- Joerg Steinkamp,
- Qiuhong Tang,
- Wim Thiery,
- Yoshihide Wada,
- Xuhui Wang,
- Graham P Weedon,
- Hong Yang,
- Tian Zhou
Affiliations
- Richard Wartenburger
- ORCiD
- Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science , ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland; Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.
- Sonia I Seneviratne
- ORCiD
- Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science , ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
- Martin Hirschi
- Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science , ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
- Jinfeng Chang
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement , UMR8212, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France; Sorbonne Universités (UPMC , Univ Paris 06)-CNRS-IRD-MNHN, LOCEAN/IPSL, Paris, France
- Philippe Ciais
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement , UMR8212, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
- Delphine Deryng
- Climate Analytics , 10969 Berlin, Germany; Columbia University Center for Climate Systems Research , New York, NY 10025, United States of America
- Joshua Elliott
- The University of Chicago, 5757 S. University Avenue , Chicago IL 60637, United States of America
- Christian Folberth
- Ecosystem Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) , Laxenburg, Austria
- Simon N Gosling
- School of Geography, University of Nottingham , Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
- Lukas Gudmundsson
- ORCiD
- Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science , ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
- Alexandra-Jane Henrot
- Unité de Modèlisation du climat et des Cycles Biogéochimiques , UR SPHERES, Université de Liège, Quartier Agora, Liège, Belgium
- Thomas Hickler
- Institute of Physical Geography, Geosciences, Goehte University , Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F) & Goethe-University Frankfurt , Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Akihiko Ito
- National Institute for Environmental Studies , Tsukuba, Japan
- Nikolay Khabarov
- International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) , Laxenburg, Austria
- Hyungjun Kim
- Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo , Tokyo, Japan
- Guoyong Leng
- Atmospheric Sciences & Global Change Division , Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, United States of America
- Junguo Liu
- International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) , Laxenburg, Austria; School of Environmental Science and Engineering, South University of Science and Technology of China , Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
- Xingcai Liu
- ORCiD
- Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Yoshimitsu Masaki
- Hirosaki University , Aomori, Japan
- Catherine Morfopoulos
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter , Exeter, United Kingdom
- Christoph Müller
- ORCiD
- Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) , Telegraphenberg A31, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
- Hannes Müller Schmied
- ORCiD
- Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe-University Frankfurt , Frankfurt, Germany; Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F) , Frankfurt, Germany
- Kazuya Nishina
- National Institute for Environmental Studies , Tsukuba, Japan
- Rene Orth
- Department of Physical Geography, Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University , SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry , D-07745 Jena, Germany
- Yadu Pokhrel
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI 48824 United States of America
- Thomas A M Pugh
- ORCiD
- School of Geography, Earth & Environmental Sciences and Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, United Kingdom; Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research - Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU) , Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
- Yusuke Satoh
- International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) , Laxenburg, Austria
- Sibyll Schaphoff
- Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) , Telegraphenberg A31, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
- Erwin Schmid
- University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Department of Economics and Social Sciences , Feistmantelstrasse 4, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
- Justin Sheffield
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University , Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America; Geography and Environment, University of Southampton , Southampton, United Kingdom
- Tobias Stacke
- Max Planck Institute for Meteorology , Hamburg, Germany
- Joerg Steinkamp
- Zentrum für Datenverarbeitung, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Germany
- Qiuhong Tang
- ORCiD
- Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Wim Thiery
- ORCiD
- Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science , ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering , Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
- Yoshihide Wada
- ORCiD
- International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) , Laxenburg, Austria
- Xuhui Wang
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement , UMR8212, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
- Graham P Weedon
- ORCiD
- Met Office (JCHMR), Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford , Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, United Kingdom
- Hong Yang
- Department of Systems Analysis , Integrated Assessment and Modelling, Eawag, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
- Tian Zhou
- ORCiD
- Atmospheric Sciences & Global Change Division , Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, United States of America
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac4bb
- Journal volume & issue
-
Vol. 13,
no. 7
p. 075001
Abstract
Actual land evapotranspiration (ET) is a key component of the global hydrological cycle and an essential variable determining the evolution of hydrological extreme events under different climate change scenarios. However, recently available ET products show persistent uncertainties that are impeding a precise attribution of human-induced climate change. Here, we aim at comparing a range of independent global monthly land ET estimates with historical model simulations from the global water, agriculture, and biomes sectors participating in the second phase of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2a). Among the independent estimates, we use the EartH2Observe Tier-1 dataset (E2O), two commonly used reanalyses, a pre-compiled ensemble product (LandFlux-EVAL), and an updated collection of recently published datasets that algorithmically derive ET from observations or observations-based estimates (diagnostic datasets). A cluster analysis is applied in order to identify spatio-temporal differences among all datasets and to thus identify factors that dominate overall uncertainties. The clustering is controlled by several factors including the model choice, the meteorological forcing used to drive the assessed models, the data category (models participating in the different sectors of ISIMIP2a, E2O models, diagnostic estimates, reanalysis-based estimates or composite products), the ET scheme, and the number of soil layers in the models. By using these factors to explain spatial and spatio-temporal variabilities in ET, we find that the model choice mostly dominates (24%–40% of variance explained), except for spatio-temporal patterns of total ET, where the forcing explains the largest fraction of the variance (29%). The most dominant clusters of datasets are further compared with individual diagnostic and reanalysis-based estimates to assess their representation of selected heat waves and droughts in the Great Plains, Central Europe and western Russia. Although most of the ET estimates capture these extreme events, the generally large spread among the entire ensemble indicates substantial uncertainties.
Keywords