P-113 EVALUATION OF THE MELNA AGIB SCALE TO PREDICT MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS AND VARICEAL HEMORRHAGE

Abstract

Conflict of interest: No Introduction and Objectives: Patients with decompensated cirrhosis are at risk of variceal hemorrhage, which increases the risk of mortality. Validated scales exist to assess this risk, but there is currently no scale that evaluates the risk of variceal hemorrhage and death simultaneously. The MELDNa AGIB (acute gastrointestinal bleeding) scale incorporates sodium (Na) levels, albumin levels, the corrected QT interval (QTc), and a history of hemorrhage to calculate mortality at 6 weeks. While it has been evaluated in other centers, further studies are needed to validate its utility. To evaluate the MELDNa-AGIB scale for predicting the risk of mortality in decompensated cirrhotic patients. Patients / Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective, analytical, observational study conducted on a cohort of patients with decompensated cirrhosis and variceal hemorrhage. The MELDNAAGIB scale was calculated for each patient and compared with other scoring systems, including MELD, MELD NA, MELD LACTATE, and MELD 3.0, to assess its effectiveness. Statistical analysis involved the construction of ROC curves to determine the prognostic value of each scoring system in predicting mortality among patients with variceal bleeding. A significance level of p456ms) as calculated using the Fridericia formula, and 67.2% had a history of previous variceal hemorrhage. The MELDNa-AGIB scale demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.849 (95% confidence interval: 0.681-0.950, p=0.004), with a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 83% when a cutoff point of 17 was applied for MELDNa-AGIB. The AUROC for predicting mortality was significantly lower for MELD/Lactate. Conclusions: Although the study group was small, the MELDNaAGIB scale showed significant performance in predicting 6-week mortality in patients who developed variceal hemorrhage.