Sensors (Sep 2023)

The Accuracy and Absolute Reliability of a Knee Surgery Assistance System Based on ArUco-Type Sensors

  • Vicente J. León-Muñoz,
  • Fernando Santonja-Medina,
  • Francisco Lajara-Marco,
  • Alonso J. Lisón-Almagro,
  • Jesús Jiménez-Olivares,
  • Carmelo Marín-Martínez,
  • Salvador Amor-Jiménez,
  • Elena Galián-Muñoz,
  • Mirian López-López,
  • Joaquín Moya-Angeler

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198091
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 19
p. 8091

Abstract

Read online

Recent advances allow the use of Augmented Reality (AR) for many medical procedures. AR via optical navigators to aid various knee surgery techniques (e.g., femoral and tibial osteotomies, ligament reconstructions or menisci transplants) is becoming increasingly frequent. Accuracy in these procedures is essential, but evaluations of this technology still need to be made. Our study aimed to evaluate the system’s accuracy using an in vitro protocol. We hypothesised that the system’s accuracy was equal to or less than 1 mm and 1° for distance and angular measurements, respectively. Our research was an in vitro laboratory with a 316 L steel model. Absolute reliability was assessed according to the Hopkins criteria by seven independent evaluators. Each observer measured the thirty palpation points and the trademarks to acquire direct angular measurements on three occasions separated by at least two weeks. The system’s accuracy in assessing distances had a mean error of 1.203 mm and an uncertainty of 2.062, and for the angular values, a mean error of 0.778° and an uncertainty of 1.438. The intraclass correlation coefficient was for all intra-observer and inter-observers, almost perfect or perfect. The mean error for the distance’s determination was statistically larger than 1 mm (1.203 mm) but with a trivial effect size. The mean error assessing angular values was statistically less than 1°. Our results are similar to those published by other authors in accuracy analyses of AR systems.

Keywords