Magnetic Nanodiscs—A New Promising Tool for Microsurgery of Malignant Neoplasms
Tatiana N. Zamay,
Vladimir S. Prokopenko,
Sergey S. Zamay,
Kirill A. Lukyanenko,
Olga S. Kolovskaya,
Vitaly A. Orlov,
Galina S. Zamay,
Rinat G. Galeev,
Andrey A. Narodov,
Anna S. Kichkailo
Affiliations
Tatiana N. Zamay
Laboratory for Biomolecular and Medical Technologies, Krasnoyarsk State Medical University Named after Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenecky, 660029 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Vladimir S. Prokopenko
Institute of Physics and Informatics, Astafiev Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University, 660049 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Sergey S. Zamay
Molecular Electronics Department, Federal Research Center, Krasnoyarsk Science Center Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Science, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Kirill A. Lukyanenko
Laboratory for Biomolecular and Medical Technologies, Krasnoyarsk State Medical University Named after Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenecky, 660029 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Olga S. Kolovskaya
Laboratory for Biomolecular and Medical Technologies, Krasnoyarsk State Medical University Named after Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenecky, 660029 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Vitaly A. Orlov
School of Engineering Physics and Radio Electronics, Siberian Federal University, 79 Svobodny pr., 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Galina S. Zamay
Laboratory for Biomolecular and Medical Technologies, Krasnoyarsk State Medical University Named after Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenecky, 660029 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Rinat G. Galeev
JSC «NPP «Radiosviaz», 660021 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Andrey A. Narodov
Traumatology Orthopedics and Neurosurgery Department, Krasnoyarsk State Medical University Named after Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenecky, 660029 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Anna S. Kichkailo
Laboratory for Biomolecular and Medical Technologies, Krasnoyarsk State Medical University Named after Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenecky, 660029 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Magnetomechanical therapy is one of the most perspective directions in tumor microsurgery. According to the analysis of recent publications, it can be concluded that a nanoscalpel could become an instrument sufficient for cancer microsurgery. It should possess the following properties: (1) nano- or microsized; (2) affinity and specificity to the targets on tumor cells; (3) remote control. This nano- or microscalpel should include at least two components: (1) a physical nanostructure (particle, disc, plates) with the ability to transform the magnetic moment to mechanical torque; (2) a ligand—a molecule (antibody, aptamer, etc.) allowing the scalpel precisely target tumor cells. Literature analysis revealed that the most suitable nanoscalpel structures are anisotropic, magnetic micro- or nanodiscs with high-saturation magnetization and the absence of remanence, facilitating scalpel remote control via the magnetic field. Additionally, anisotropy enhances the transmigration of the discs to the tumor. To date, four types of magnetic microdiscs have been used for tumor destruction: synthetic antiferromagnetic P-SAF (perpendicular) and SAF (in-plane), vortex Py, and three-layer non-magnetic–ferromagnet–non-magnetic systems with flat quasi-dipole magnetic structures. In the current review, we discuss the biological effects of magnetic discs, the mechanisms of action, and the toxicity in alternating or rotating magnetic fields in vitro and in vivo. Based on the experimental data presented in the literature, we conclude that the targeted and remotely controlled magnetic field nanoscalpel is an effective and safe instrument for cancer therapy or theranostics.