Diagnostics (Feb 2023)

Assessment of the Accuracy, Usability and Acceptability of a Rapid Test for the Simultaneous Diagnosis of Syphilis and HIV Infection in a Real-Life Scenario in the Amazon Region, Brazil

  • Daniela Cristina Soares,
  • Luciano Chaves Franco Filho,
  • Herald Souza dos Reis,
  • Yan Corrêa Rodrigues,
  • Felipe Bonfim Freitas,
  • Cintya de Oliveira Souza,
  • Giseli Nogueira Damacena,
  • Nazle Mendonça Collaço Véras,
  • Pamela Cristina Gaspar,
  • Adele Schwartz Benzaken,
  • Joana da Felicidade Ribeiro Favacho,
  • Olinda Macedo,
  • Maria Luiza Bazzo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040810
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 4
p. 810

Abstract

Read online

We field-assessed the accuracy, acceptability, and feasibility of the SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo rapid diagnostic test in three groups: pregnant women, female sex workers (FSW), and men who have sex with men (MSM). Venous blood samples collected in the field were compared with the respective gold standard methods: SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo Treponemal Test versus FTA-abs (Wama brand) treponemal laboratory test for syphilis, and SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo Test versus the fourth generation Genscreen Ultra HIV Ag-Ag (Bio-Rad brand) laboratory test for HIV. From a total of 529 participants, 397 (75.1%) were pregnant women, 76 (14.3%) FSW and 56 (10.6%) MSM. Sensitivity and specificity parameters of HIV were 100.0% (95% CI: 82.35–100.0%) and 100.0% (95% CI: 99.28–100.0%), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity parameters found for TP antibody detection were 95.00% (95% CI: 87.69–98.62%) and 100.0% (95% CI: 98.18–100.0%), respectively. The SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo Test showed high acceptability among participants (85.87%) and health professionals (85.51%), as well as easy usability by professionals (91.06%). The usability of the SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo Test kit would not be a barrier to accessing rapid testing, if the product were incorporated into the list of health service supplies.

Keywords