International Journal of General Medicine (Oct 2023)

Comparative Analysis of Eccentric Glenosphere in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Computer Simulation Study

  • Xu X,
  • Sun Q,
  • Liu Y,
  • Wang D,
  • Diao S,
  • Wang H,
  • Gao Y,
  • Lu T,
  • Zhou J

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 16
pp. 4691 – 4704

Abstract

Read online

Xiaopei Xu, Qingnan Sun, Yang Liu, Dong Wang, Shuo Diao, Hanzhou Wang, Yuling Gao, Tianchao Lu, Junlin Zhou Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Junlin Zhou, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +86-01085231227, Email [email protected]: The aim was to evaluate the effects of different glenosphere eccentricities on impingement, range of motion (ROM), and muscle length during standard activities in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA).Methods: In this study, we utilized computational modeling techniques to create native shoulder and shoulder models undergoing RSA and simulate shoulder movements in all abduction-adduction, flexion-extension, and rotation. We tested a total of 36 different glenosphere configurations, which included three different inferior tilts (0°, +10°, +20°) and two different lateral offsets (0 mm and +4 mm), as well as six different glenosphere eccentricities (concentricity, inferior, posterior, anterior, anteroinferior, and posteroinferior). We evaluated the maximum impingement-free ROM, impingement sites, and muscle lengths.Results: All glenosphere configurations exceeded 50% of native shoulder ROM in three planes and total global ROM. In abduction-adduction, there was no significant difference among the different glenosphere eccentricities (p > 0.05). In flexion-extension, the posteroinferior eccentricity had the maximum ROM among the different eccentricities, but no significant difference among the different glenosphere eccentricities (p > 0.05). In rotation, there was a significant difference overall, and anteroinferior eccentricity had a significant advantage over concentricity (p < 0.05). In total global ROM, anteroinferior eccentricity had a significant advantage over concentricity when lateral offset was 0 mm (p < 0.05). In all models of glenosphere eccentricities, only the elongation of the infraspinatus muscle was statistically significant (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Glenosphere eccentricity significantly influenced rotation, total global ROM, and the length of the subscapularis muscle. Among them, anteroinferior offset achieved the maximum ROM in abduction-adduction, rotation, and total global activities. Both anteroinferior and inferior glenoid eccentricity showed significant advantages over the concentricity in rotation and total global ROM.Level of Evidence: Basic Science Study; Computer Modeling.Graphical Abstract: Keywords: reverse shoulder arthroplasty, glenosphere eccentricities, impingement, notching, range of motion, muscle length

Keywords