PLOS Digital Health (May 2024)

Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities.

  • Jee Young Kim,
  • Alifia Hasan,
  • Katherine C Kellogg,
  • William Ratliff,
  • Sara G Murray,
  • Harini Suresh,
  • Alexandra Valladares,
  • Keo Shaw,
  • Danny Tobey,
  • David E Vidal,
  • Mark A Lifson,
  • Manesh Patel,
  • Inioluwa Deborah Raji,
  • Michael Gao,
  • William Knechtle,
  • Linda Tang,
  • Suresh Balu,
  • Mark P Sendak

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000390
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 5
p. e0000390

Abstract

Read online

The use of data-driven technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) is growing in healthcare. However, the proliferation of healthcare AI tools has outpaced regulatory frameworks, accountability measures, and governance standards to ensure safe, effective, and equitable use. To address these gaps and tackle a common challenge faced by healthcare delivery organizations, a case-based workshop was organized, and a framework was developed to evaluate the potential impact of implementing an AI solution on health equity. The Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL) is co-designed with extensive engagement of clinical, operational, technical, and regulatory leaders across healthcare delivery organizations and ecosystem partners in the US. It assesses 5 equity assessment domains-accountability, fairness, fitness for purpose, reliability and validity, and transparency-across the span of eight key decision points in the AI adoption lifecycle. It is a process-oriented framework containing 37 step-by-step procedures for evaluating an existing AI solution and 34 procedures for evaluating a new AI solution in total. Within each procedure, it identifies relevant key stakeholders and data sources used to conduct the procedure. HEAAL guides how healthcare delivery organizations may mitigate the potential risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities. It also informs how much resources and support are required to assess the potential impact of AI solutions on health inequities.