Research Involvement and Engagement (Feb 2024)

Navigating meaningful engagement: lessons from partnering with youth and families in brain-based disability research

  • Linda Nguyen,
  • Kinga Pozniak,
  • Sonya Strohm,
  • Jessica Havens,
  • Claire Dawe-McCord,
  • Donna Thomson,
  • Connie Putterman,
  • Dana Arafeh,
  • Barb Galuppi,
  • Alicia Via-Dufresne Ley,
  • Shelley Doucet,
  • Khush Amaria,
  • Adrienne H. Kovacs,
  • Ariane Marelli,
  • Ronen Rozenblum,
  • Jan Willem Gorter,
  • CHILD-BRIGHT READYorNot™ Brain-Based Disabilities Trial Study Group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-024-00543-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background While patient and family engagement in research has become a widespread practice, meaningful and authentic engagement remains a challenge. In the READYorNot™ Brain-Based Disabilities Study, we developed the MyREADY Transition™ Brain-Based Disabilities App to promote education, empowerment, and navigation for the transition from pediatric to adult care among youth with brain-based disabilities, aged 15–17 years old. Our research team created a Patient and Family Advisory Council (PFAC) to engage adolescents, young adults, and parent caregivers as partners throughout our multi-year and multi-stage project. Main body This commentary, initiated and co-authored by members of our PFAC, researchers, staff, and a trainee, describes how we corrected the course of our partnership in response to critical feedback from partners. We begin by highlighting an email testimonial from a young adult PFAC member, which constituted a “critical turning point,” that unveiled feelings of unclear expectations, lack of appreciation, and imbalanced relationships among PFAC members. As a team, we reflected on our partnership experiences and reviewed documentation of PFAC activities. This process allowed us to set three intentions to create a collective goal of authentic and meaningful engagement and to chart the course to get us there: (1) offering clarity and flexibility around participation; (2) valuing and acknowledging partners and their contributions; and (3) providing choice and leveraging individual interests and strengths. Our key recommendations include: (1) charting the course with a plan to guide our work; (2) learning the ropes by developing capacity for patient-oriented research; (3) all hands on deck by building a community of engagement; and (4) making course corrections and being prepared to weather the storms by remaining open to reflection, re-evaluation, and adjustment as necessary. Conclusions We share key recommendations and lessons learned from our experiences alongside examples from the literature to offer guidance for multi-stage research projects partnering with adolescents, young adults, and family partners. We hope that by sharing challenges and lessons learned, we can help advance patient and family engagement in research.

Keywords