Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease (Jan 2024)

Deferasirox Targeting Ferroptosis Synergistically Ameliorates Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in Conjunction With Cyclosporine A

  • Kosei Ishimaru,
  • Masataka Ikeda,
  • Hiroko Deguchi Miyamoto,
  • Shun Furusawa,
  • Ko Abe,
  • Masatsugu Watanabe,
  • Takuya Kanamura,
  • Satoshi Fujita,
  • Ryohei Nishimura,
  • Takayuki Toyohara,
  • Shouji Matsushima,
  • Tomoko Koumura,
  • Ken‐ichi Yamada,
  • Hirotaka Imai,
  • Hiroyuki Tsutsui,
  • Tomomi Ide

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.031219
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Background Ferroptosis, an iron‐dependent form of regulated cell death, is a major cell death mode in myocardial ischemia reperfusion (I/R) injury, along with mitochondrial permeability transition‐driven necrosis, which is inhibited by cyclosporine A (CsA). However, therapeutics targeting ferroptosis during myocardial I/R injury have not yet been developed. Hence, we aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of deferasirox, an iron chelator, against hypoxia/reoxygenation‐induced ferroptosis in cultured cardiomyocytes and myocardial I/R injury. Methods and Results The effects of deferasirox on hypoxia/reoxygenation‐induced iron overload in the endoplasmic reticulum, lipid peroxidation, and ferroptosis were examined in cultured cardiomyocytes. In a mouse model of I/R injury, the infarct size and adverse cardiac remodeling were examined after treatment with deferasirox, CsA, or both in combination. Deferasirox suppressed hypoxia‐ or hypoxia/reoxygenation‐induced iron overload in the endoplasmic reticulum, lipid peroxidation, and ferroptosis in cultured cardiomyocytes. Deferasirox treatment reduced iron levels in the endoplasmic reticulum and prevented increases in lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis in the I/R‐injured myocardium 24 hours after I/R. Deferasirox and CsA independently reduced the infarct size after I/R injury to a similar degree, and combination therapy with deferasirox and CsA synergistically reduced the infarct size (infarct area/area at risk; control treatment: 64±2%; deferasirox treatment: 48±3%; CsA treatment: 48±4%; deferasirox+CsA treatment: 37±3%), thereby ameliorating adverse cardiac remodeling on day 14 after I/R. Conclusions Combination therapy with deferasirox and CsA may be a clinically feasible and effective therapeutic approach for limiting I/R injury and ameliorating adverse cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction.

Keywords