Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States; California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States; California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
Andres H de la Peña
Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
Mary E Matyskiela
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States; California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States; California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
The 26S proteasome is essential for proteostasis and the regulation of vital processes through ATP-dependent degradation of ubiquitinated substrates. To accomplish the multi-step degradation process, the proteasome’s regulatory particle, consisting of lid and base subcomplexes, undergoes major conformational changes whose origin is unknown. Investigating the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteasome, we found that peripheral interactions between the lid subunit Rpn5 and the base AAA+ ATPase ring are important for stabilizing the substrate-engagement-competent state and coordinating the conformational switch to processing states upon substrate engagement. Disrupting these interactions perturbs the conformational equilibrium and interferes with degradation initiation, while later processing steps remain unaffected. Similar defects in early degradation steps are observed when eliminating hydrolysis in the ATPase subunit Rpt6, whose nucleotide state seems to control proteasome conformational transitions. These results provide important insight into interaction networks that coordinate conformational changes with various stages of degradation, and how modulators of conformational equilibria may influence substrate turnover.
