Performance Analysis of Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterization Schemes in WRF Modeling Set Up over Southern Italy
Bhishma Tyagi,
Vincenzo Magliulo,
Sandro Finardi,
Daniele Gasbarra,
Pantaleone Carlucci,
Piero Toscano,
Alessandro Zaldei,
Angelo Riccio,
Giuseppe Calori,
Alessio D’Allura,
Beniamino Gioli
Affiliations
Bhishma Tyagi
National Research Council, Institute for Agricultural and Forestry Systems in the Mediterranean (CNR-Isafom), ViaPatacca 85, 80040 Ercolano, Napoli, Italy
Vincenzo Magliulo
National Research Council, Institute for Agricultural and Forestry Systems in the Mediterranean (CNR-Isafom), ViaPatacca 85, 80040 Ercolano, Napoli, Italy
Sandro Finardi
Arianetsrl, viaGilino 9, 20128 Milano, Italy
Daniele Gasbarra
National Research Council, Institute for Agricultural and Forestry Systems in the Mediterranean (CNR-Isafom), ViaPatacca 85, 80040 Ercolano, Napoli, Italy
Pantaleone Carlucci
National Research Council, Institute for Agricultural and Forestry Systems in the Mediterranean (CNR-Isafom), ViaPatacca 85, 80040 Ercolano, Napoli, Italy
Piero Toscano
National Research Council, Institute of Biometeorology (CNR-Ibimet), ViaCaproni 8, 50145 Firenze, Italy
Alessandro Zaldei
National Research Council, Institute of Biometeorology (CNR-Ibimet), ViaCaproni 8, 50145 Firenze, Italy
Angelo Riccio
Department of Applied Sciences, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Centro Direzionale–Isola C4, 80143 Napoli, Italy
Giuseppe Calori
Arianetsrl, viaGilino 9, 20128 Milano, Italy
Alessio D’Allura
Arianetsrl, viaGilino 9, 20128 Milano, Italy
Beniamino Gioli
National Research Council, Institute of Biometeorology (CNR-Ibimet), ViaCaproni 8, 50145 Firenze, Italy
Predictions of boundary layer meteorological parameters with accuracy are essential for achieving good weather and air quality regional forecast. In the present work, we have analyzed seven planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterization schemes in a Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model over the Naples-Caserta region of Southern Italy. WRF model simulations were performed with 1-km horizontal resolution, and the results were compared against data collected by the small aircraft Sky Arrow Environmental Research Aircraft (ERA) during 7–9 October 2014. The selected PBL schemes include three first-order closure PBL schemes (ACM2, MRF, YSU) and four turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) closure schemes (MYJ, UW, MYNN2, and BouLac). A performance analysis of these PBL schemes has been investigated by validating them with aircraft measurements of meteorological parameters profiles (air temperature, specific humidity, wind speed, wind direction) and PBL height to assess their efficiency in terms of the reproduction of observed weather conditions. Results suggested that the TKE closure schemes perform better than first-order closure schemes, and the MYNN2 closure scheme is close to observed values most of the time. It is observed that the inland locations are better simulated than sea locations, and the morning periods are better simulated than those in the afternoon. The results are emphasizing that meteorology-induced variability is larger than the variability in PBL schemes.