Buildings (May 2023)

Hot Water Generation for Domestic Use in Residential Buildings via PCM Integrated U-Tube Based Solar Thermal Collector: A 4-E Analysis

  • Sudhir Kumar Pathak,
  • V. V. Tyagi,
  • K. Chopra,
  • A. K. Pandey,
  • Ahmet Sari

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051212
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 5
p. 1212

Abstract

Read online

In recent years, building energy consumption has increased every day due to population growth and an increased human desire for a healthy and pleasant lifestyle, and this is responsible for a crisis of energy shortages worldwide. Therefore, use of solar water heating (SWH) systems in buildings for hot water demand is the prime need of the hour to maintain sustainability. The novelty of this work was in developing a phase change material (stearic acid)-filled U-tube based evacuated tube solar collector (collector A). In addition, another collector B, left without energy storage material, was considered a reference unit for comparing the energy and exergy outputs. The study’s main aim was to examine the energy, exergy, enviro- and exergoeconomic analysis of newly developed water heating systems. The findings of study revealed that the maximum daily energy outputs of collector A were found to be 85.86% (simultaneous mode) and 84.27% (midday charging mode) at a high mass flow rate (0.5 LPM), and exergy outputs were 19.41% and 21.35%, respectively, at a low flow rate. The thermal output of collector A was higher than that of collector B. The per liter cost of hot water produced from collector A with PCMs was found to be INR 0.1261 and INR 0.1276, respectively, under both modes, which is less compared with the electric geyser (0.325 INR). The levelized energy cost, net present worth, and the payback time of the developed collector A obtained were 4.61 INR/kWh, INR 49710, and 4.49 years (simultaneous), and 4.67 INR/kWh, INR 48130, and 4.64 years (mid-day charging), respectively. Furthermore, the amount of CO2 mitigation from the energy and exergy perspective for collector A was found to be 24.30 and 23.76 tCO2/lifetime and 5.31, 5.58 tCO2/lifetime, respectively.

Keywords