BMC Global and Public Health (Aug 2024)

“As a patient I do not belong to the clinic, I belong to the community”: co-developing multi-level, person-centred tuberculosis stigma interventions in Cape Town, South Africa

  • Sally E. Hayward,
  • Nosivuyile Vanqa,
  • Goodman Makanda,
  • Phumeza Tisile,
  • Luthando Ngwatyu,
  • Isabel Foster,
  • Abenathi A. Mcinziba,
  • Amanda Biewer,
  • Rachel Mbuyamba,
  • Michelle Galloway,
  • Siyavuya Bunyula,
  • Helene-Mari van der Westhuizen,
  • Jon S. Friedland,
  • Andrew Medina-Marino,
  • Lario Viljoen,
  • Ingrid Schoeman,
  • Graeme Hoddinott,
  • Ruvandhi R. Nathavitharana

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-024-00084-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Anticipated, internal, and enacted stigma are major barriers to tuberculosis (TB) care engagement and directly impact patient well-being. Unfortunately, targeted stigma interventions are lacking. We aimed to co-develop a person-centred stigma intervention with TB-affected community members and health workers in South Africa. Methods Using a community-based participatory research approach, we conducted ten group discussions with people diagnosed with TB (past or present), caregivers, and health workers (total n = 87) in Khayelitsha, Cape Town. Group discussions were facilitated by TB survivors. Discussion guides explored experiences and drivers of stigma and used human-centred design principles to co-develop solutions. Recordings were transcribed, coded, thematically analysed, and then further interpreted using the socio-ecological model and behaviour change wheel framework. Results Intervention components across socio-ecological levels shared common functions linked to effective behaviour change, namely education, training, enablement, persuasion, modelling, and environmental restructuring. At the individual level, participants recommended counselling to improve TB knowledge and provide ongoing support. TB survivors can guide messaging to nurture stigma resilience by highlighting that TB can affect anyone and is curable, and provide lived experiences of TB to decrease internal and anticipated stigma. At the interpersonal level, support clubs and family-centred counselling were suggested to dispel TB-related myths and foster support. At the institutional level, health worker stigma reduction training informed by TB survivor perspectives was recommended to decrease enacted stigma. Participants discussed how integration of TB/HIV care services may exacerbate TB/HIV intersectional stigma and ideas for restructured service delivery models were suggested. At the community level, participants recommended awareness-raising events led by TB survivors, including TB information in school curricula. At the policy level, solutions focused on reducing the visibility generated by a TB diagnosis and resultant stigma in health facilities and shifting tasks to community health workers. Conclusions Decreasing TB stigma requires a multi-level approach. Co-developing a person-centred intervention with affected communities is feasible and generates stigma intervention components that are directed and implementable. Such community-led multi-level intervention components should be prioritised by TB programs, including integrated TB/HIV care services.

Keywords