Medicina (Oct 2024)

Investigating the Potential Overuse of Pan-Computed Tomography (PanCT) Examinations in Trauma Cases in Emergency Departments

  • Haitham Alahmad,
  • Ahmed Hobani,
  • Mohammed Alasmi,
  • Abdulrhman M. Alshahrani,
  • Ahmad Abanomy,
  • Mohammad Alarifi,
  • Abdulmajeed Alotaibi,
  • Khaled Alenazi,
  • Mansour Almanaa

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111742
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 60, no. 11
p. 1742

Abstract

Read online

Background and Objectives: The increasing use of whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) examinations, also known as panCT, in emergency departments for trauma patients has raised concerns about potential overuse and the associated risk of unnecessary radiation exposure. The purpose of this study was to examine the utilization patterns and findings of panCT scans performed over one year at a major academic hospital. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 531 stable trauma adult patients who underwent panCT scans in 2023. De-identified data for each patient, including the radiology report, age, gender, and total dose-length product (DLP) of the panCT scan, were retrieved and reviewed. Radiology reports were classified based on the findings as negative (no acute traumatic injuries) or positive, with positive reports further subclassified based on injury location. Injury severity scores (ISS) were also calculated based on the findings of the radiology reports. Statistical analysis was performed using the Python programming language to assess any association between the independent variables (age and gender) and the dependent variable (report findings: negative or positive). Results: About 57% (n = 303) of the panCT scans included in the analysis were negative. The chi-squared test and logistic regression revealed a significant association between age and report finding (negative or positive), while no association with gender was found. One-third of positive cases (n = 72) had injuries only in the head and neck (H&N) region, and another one-third (n = 72) had injuries only in chest-abdomen-pelvis (CAP) region. Most cases (n = 373; 70%) had an ISS between 1 and 8, which is a mild score. Conclusions: This study showed a high rate of negative panCT scans, suggesting potential overuse of panCT. The study results highlight the need for more selective CT imaging approaches in emergency settings. Following evidence-based guidelines and decision-support tools could promote appropriate utilization of panCT scans, reducing unnecessary radiation exposure while ensuring that high-risk patients in emergency setting receive appropriate imaging.

Keywords