Journal of Arrhythmia (Jun 2016)

The feasibility of a Box isolation strategy for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in elderly patients

  • Satoshi Higuchi, MD,
  • Hiroshi Sohara, MD, PhD,
  • Yoshinori Nakamura, MD, PhD,
  • Minoru Ihara, MD, PhD,
  • Yoshio Yamaguchi, MD, PhD,
  • Morio Shoda, MD, PhD,
  • Nobuhisa Hagiwara, MD, PhD,
  • Shutaro Satake, MD, PhD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joa.2016.02.002
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 32, no. 3
pp. 198 – 203

Abstract

Read online

Background: Catheter ablation of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (non-PAF) is a therapeutic challenge especially in elderly patients. This study describes the feasibility of a posterior left atrium isolation as a substrate modification in addition to pulmonary vein isolation, the so-called Box isolation, for elderly patients with non-PAF. Methods: Two hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients who underwent Box isolations for drug-refractory non-PAF were divided into two groups according to their age; younger group comprising 175 patients aged <75 years and elderly group comprising 54 patients aged ≥75 years. Results: During 23.7±12.0 months of follow-up, the arrhythmia-free rates after one procedure were 53.1% in younger group versus 48.1% in elderly group (p=0.50). Following the second procedure, all patients had electrical conduction recoveries along the initial Box lesion. However, a complete Box re-isolation was highly established in both age groups (87.1% vs. 92.9%, respectively; p=1.00). Recurrence of macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia was mainly associated with the gaps through the initial Box lesion in both age groups (25.8% vs. 21.4%, p=1.00), but typical cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) dependent atrial flutter was significantly observed in the elderly patients’ group only (all events were observed within 6 months after the initial procedure; 3.2% vs. 28.6%, p=0.009). After two procedures, the arrhythmia-free rates increased to 73.1% in younger group versus 66.7% in elderly group (p=0.38). The occurrence rate of procedural-related complications did not differ between the two age groups, and there were no life-threatening complications even in elderly patients. Conclusions: Box isolation of non-PAF is effective and safe even in elderly patients. A prophylactic CTI ablation combined with Box isolation might be feasible to improve the long-term outcome.

Keywords