Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal (Jun 2024)

Prevalence of Genetic Mutations in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer in a Cohort of Mexican Patients

  • Orión Erenhú Rodríguez González,
  • Edgar Iván Bravo Castro,
  • Jesus Eduardo Osorio,
  • Habiram Pacheco Guerrero,
  • Brenda Suaste Carmona,
  • Luis David Arreola Peralta,
  • Noe Esaul Martinez Juárez,
  • Juan Samuel Izquierdo Luna,
  • José de Jesús Oswaldo Islas García,
  • Omar Dimas Victorio Vargas,
  • Rafael Alberto Valdez Flores,
  • Jesús Javier Torres Gómez,
  • José Gadú Campos Salcedo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj5030027
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 3
pp. 172 – 181

Abstract

Read online

Background: Prostate cancer is a malignant neoplasm of the male genitourinary system with the highest incidence worldwide. Susceptibility genes related to aggressiveness and prognosis, such as BRCA1/2, ATM, PTEN, have been identified. Currently, reports related to germline mutations in patients with prostate cancer in Latin American populations are very limited or absent. In the Mexican population, reports are also limited, especially in the context of metastatic prostate cancer. Determining the prevalence of these mutations is relevant to predict the potential aggressiveness of tumors and allow the use of targeted therapies, such as PARPi inhibitors. Objective: Determine the prevalence of germline mutations in patients with metastatic prostate cancer and establish their clinical characteristics at diagnosis. Material and Methods: Sixty-nine patients with metastatic PCa underwent testing and genetic analysis using the Comprehensive Multi-Cancer Hereditary Cancer Panel. The prevalence of germline mutations was assessed, and the cohort was divided into two groups for the evaluation and analysis of clinical characteristics between the mutated and non-mutated populations. Results: We identified mutations in 15 out of 69 patients (21.73%), while 54 patients (78.26%) had no mutations. Pathogenic mutations were observed in 15.9% of patients, Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) in 34.78%, and 5.79% had both. The most frequent mutations included ATM (11.54%), BRCA1 (11.54%), BRCA2 (7.69%), FANCA (7.69%), and FANCM (7.69%). No statistically significant differences were found in PSA levels, age at diagnosis, and resistance to castration between the two groups. Conclusions: Our study unveiled a mutation rate of 21.73%, marked by a significant prevalence of ATM, FANCA, FANCM, and Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS). This pattern deviates from findings in other series, underscoring the necessity for improved access to clinical genetic testing in our population.

Keywords