BMC Research Notes (Dec 2019)

Different forms of informal coercion in psychiatry: a qualitative study

  • Veikko Pelto-Piri,
  • Lars Kjellin,
  • Ulrika Hylén,
  • Emanuele Valenti,
  • Stefan Priebe

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4823-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1
pp. 1 – 4

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objectives The objective of the study was to investigate how mental health professionals describe and reflect upon different forms of informal coercion. Results In a deductive qualitative content analysis of focus group interviews, several examples of persuasion, interpersonal leverage, inducements, and threats were found. Persuasion was sometimes described as being more like a negotiation. Some participants worried about that the use of interpersonal leverage and inducements risked to pass into blackmail in some situations. In a following inductive analysis, three more categories of informal coercion was found: cheating, using a disciplinary style and referring to rules and routines. Participants also described situations of coercion from other stakeholders: relatives and other authorities than psychiatry. The results indicate that informal coercion includes forms that are not obviously arranged in a hierarchy, and that its use is complex with a variety of pathways between different forms before treatment is accepted by the patient or compulsion is imposed.

Keywords