Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme: a prospective analysis in the Genetics and Vascular Health Check (GENVASC) study
Kamlesh Khunti,
Azhar Farooqi,
Michelle Newton,
Riyaz Patel,
Vasiliki Bountziouka,
Nilesh J Samani,
Mayur Lakhani,
Andrea Marshall,
Radoslaw Debiec,
Shireen Kharodia,
Daniel Lawday,
Emma Beeston,
Chris Greengrass,
Richard Bramley,
Sue Sehmi,
Andre Krzeminski,
Azhar Zafar,
Anuj Chahal,
Amardeep Heer,
Nitin Joshi
Affiliations
Kamlesh Khunti
Diabetes Research Department, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Azhar Farooqi
4 NIHR Applied Research Collaboration-East Midlands (ARC-EM), Leicester, UK
Michelle Newton
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Riyaz Patel
Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
Vasiliki Bountziouka
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Nilesh J Samani
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Mayur Lakhani
Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Andrea Marshall
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Radoslaw Debiec
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Shireen Kharodia
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Daniel Lawday
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Emma Beeston
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Chris Greengrass
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Richard Bramley
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Sue Sehmi
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Andre Krzeminski
Albany House Medical Centre, Wellingborough, UK
Azhar Zafar
Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Anuj Chahal
South Leicestershire Medical Group, Kibworth Beauchamp, UK
Objective The aim of the study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of the national cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention programme—National Health Service Health Check (NHSHC) in reduction of CVD risk.Design Prospective cohort study.Setting 147 primary care practices in Leicestershire and Northamptonshire in England, UK.Participants 27 888 individuals undergoing NHSHC with a minimum of 18 months of follow-up data.Outcome measures The primary outcomes were NHSHC attributed detection of CVD risk factors, prescription of medications, changes in values of individual risk factors and frequency of follow-up.Results At recruitment, 18% of participants had high CVD risk (10%–20% 10-year risk) and 4% very high CVD risk (>20% 10-year risk). New diagnoses or hypertension (HTN) was made in 2.3% participants, hypercholesterolaemia in 0.25% and diabetes mellitus in 0.9%. New prescription of stains and antihypertensive medications was observed in 5.4% and 5.4% of participants, respectively. Total cholesterol was decreased on average by 0.38 mmol/L (95% CI −0.34 to −0.41) and 1.71 mmol/L (−1.48 to −1.94) in patients with initial cholesterol >5 mmol/L and >7.5 mmol/L, respectively. Systolic blood pressure was decreased on average by 2.9 mm Hg (−2.3 to −3.7), 15.7 mm Hg (−14.1 to −17.5) and 33.4 mm Hg (−29.4 to −37.7), in patients with grade 1, 2 and 3 HTN, respectively. About one out of three patients with increased CVD risk had no record of follow-up or treatment.Conclusions Majority of patients identified with increased CVD risk through the NHSHC were followed up and received effective clinical interventions. However, one-third of high CVD risk patients had no follow-up and therefore did not receive any treatment. Our study highlights areas of focus which could improve the effectiveness of the programme.Trial registration number NCT04417387.