In Autumn 2020, DOAJ will be relaunching with a new website with updated functionality, improved search, and a simplified application form. More information is available on our blog. Our API is also changing.

Hide this message

Kritik atas Kritik Kamaruddin Amin terhadap Riwayat Mudallisīn dalam Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī dan Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora. 2017;3(2):165-188

 

Journal Homepage

Journal Title: Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora

ISSN: 2476-9541 (Print); 2580-8885 (Online)

Publisher: Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Jember

Society/Institution: IAIN Jember

LCC Subject Category: Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Islam. Bahai Faith. Theosophy, etc.: Islam

Country of publisher: Indonesia

Language of fulltext: Indonesian

Full-text formats available: PDF

 

AUTHORS


M. Syukrillah (Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya)

EDITORIAL INFORMATION

Double blind peer review

Editorial Board

Instructions for authors

Time From Submission to Publication: 30 weeks

 

Abstract | Full Text

This research is prompted by the thought of Kamaruddin Amin who challenges the concept of ‘Ulūm al-Ḥadīth about the transmission of mudallisīn in the Ṣahīḥ al-Bukhārī and Ṣahīḥ Muslīm. The article finds that: first, there have been inconsistencies and gaps between the theory and practice in the concept of tadlīs; second, there are negative implications of application of tadlīs according to ‘Ulūm al-Ḥadīth against the transmission of mudallisīn; third, Ṣīghat al-Taḥammul wa al-Adā’ has no significance either in the study of ḥadīth authentication in general or in the context of tadlīs in particular; fourth, Nāsir al-Dīn al-Albānī’s method of determining the authenticity of mudallas ḥadīth has a weakness and negative implications upon mudallas ḥadīths in general; fifth, the application of mudallas ḥadīth criticism according to the traditional method using al-jarḥ muqaddam ‘alā al-ta‘dīl idhā kānā mufassaran when the controversy occurs in the assessment of the predicate of a ḥadīth; and sixth, orientalist’s method of giving the calendar to the ḥadīth can be used as an alternative way to overcome the weaknesses of the method of classical ḥadīth science.