Scientific Reports (Jun 2024)

Integrated PBPK-EO modeling of osimertinib to predict plasma concentrations and intracranial EGFR engagement in patients with brain metastases

  • Feng Liang,
  • Yimei Zhang,
  • Qian Xue,
  • Xiaoling Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63743-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model combined with an EGFR occupancy (EO) model for osimertinib (OSI) to predict plasma trough concentration (Ctrough) and the intracranial time-course of EGFR (T790M and L858R mutants) engagement in patient populations. The PBPK model was also used to investigate the key factors affecting OSI pharmacokinetics (PK) and intracranial EGFR engagement, analyze resistance to the target mutation C797S, and determine optimal dosing regimens when used alone and in drug-drug interactions (DDIs). A population PBPK-EO model of OSI was developed using physicochemical, biochemical, binding kinetic, and physiological properties, and then validated using nine clinical PK studies, observed EO study, and two clinical DDI studies. The PBPK-EO model demonstrated good consistency with observed data, with most prediction-to-observation ratios falling within the range of 0.7 to 1.3 for plasma AUC, Cmax, Ctrough and intracranial free concentration. The simulated time-course of C797S occupancy by the PBPK model was much lower than T790M and L858R occupancy, providing an explanation for OSI on-target resistance to the C797S mutation. The PBPK model identified ABCB1 CLint,u, albumin level, and EGFR expression as key factors affecting plasma Ctrough and intracranial EO for OSI. Additionally, PBPK-EO simulations indicated that the optimal dosing regimen for OSI in patients with brain metastases is either 80 mg once daily (OD) or 160 mg OD, or 40 mg or 80 mg twice daily (BID). When used concomitantly with CYP enzyme perpetrators, the PBPK-EO model suggested appropriate dosing regimens of 80 mg OD with fluvoxamine (FLUV) itraconazole (ITR) or fluvoxamine (FLUC) for co-administration and an increase to 160 mg OD with rifampicin (RIF) or efavirenz (EFA). In conclusion, the PBPK-EO model has been shown to be capable of simulating the pharmacokinetic concentration–time profiles and the time-course of EGFR engagement for OSI, as well as determining the optimum dosing in various clinical situations.

Keywords