Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Feb 2011)

The Chemistry of Atmosphere-Forest Exchange (CAFE) Model – Part 2: Application to BEARPEX-2007 observations

  • G. M. Wolfe,
  • J. A. Thornton,
  • N. C. Bouvier-Brown,
  • A. H. Goldstein,
  • J.-H. Park,
  • M. McKay,
  • D. M. Matross,
  • J. Mao,
  • W. H. Brune,
  • B. W. LaFranchi,
  • E. C. Browne,
  • K.-E. Min,
  • P. J. Wooldridge,
  • R. C. Cohen,
  • J. D. Crounse,
  • I. C. Faloona,
  • J. B. Gilman,
  • W. C. Kuster,
  • J. A. de Gouw,
  • A. Huisman,
  • F. N. Keutsch

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1269-2011
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 3
pp. 1269 – 1294

Abstract

Read online

In a companion paper, we introduced the Chemistry of Atmosphere-Forest Exchange (CAFE) model, a vertically-resolved 1-D chemical transport model designed to probe the details of near-surface reactive gas exchange. Here, we apply CAFE to noontime observations from the 2007 Biosphere Effects on Aerosols and Photochemistry Experiment (BEARPEX-2007). In this work we evaluate the CAFE modeling approach, demonstrate the significance of in-canopy chemistry for forest-atmosphere exchange and identify key shortcomings in the current understanding of intra-canopy processes. <br><br> CAFE generally reproduces BEARPEX-2007 observations but requires an enhanced radical recycling mechanism to overcome a factor of 6 underestimate of hydroxyl (OH) concentrations observed during a warm (~29 °C) period. Modeled fluxes of acyl peroxy nitrates (APN) are quite sensitive to gradients in chemical production and loss, demonstrating that chemistry may perturb forest-atmosphere exchange even when the chemical timescale is long relative to the canopy mixing timescale. The model underestimates peroxy acetyl nitrate (PAN) fluxes by 50% and the exchange velocity by nearly a factor of three under warmer conditions, suggesting that near-surface APN sinks are underestimated relative to the sources. Nitric acid typically dominates gross dry N deposition at this site, though other reactive nitrogen (NO<sub>y</sub>) species can comprise up to 28% of the N deposition budget under cooler conditions. Upward NO<sub>2</sub> fluxes cause the net above-canopy NO<sub>y</sub> flux to be ~30% lower than the gross depositional flux. CAFE under-predicts ozone fluxes and exchange velocities by ~20%. Large uncertainty in the parameterization of cuticular and ground deposition precludes conclusive attribution of non-stomatal fluxes to chemistry or surface uptake. Model-measurement comparisons of vertical concentration gradients for several emitted species suggests that the lower canopy airspace may be only weakly coupled with the upper canopy. Future efforts to model forest-atmosphere exchange will require a more mechanistic understanding of non-stomatal deposition and a more thorough characterization of in-canopy mixing processes.