BMC Veterinary Research (Jun 2020)

Evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic test kit to the gold standard fluorescent antibody test for diagnosis of rabies in animals in Bhutan

  • Tenzin Tenzin,
  • Kelzang Lhamo,
  • Purna B. Rai,
  • Dawa Tshering,
  • Pema Jamtsho,
  • Jamyang Namgyal,
  • Thrinang Wangdi,
  • Sangay Letho,
  • Tuku Rai,
  • Sonam Jamtsho,
  • Chendu Dorji,
  • Sangay Rinchen,
  • Lungten Lungten,
  • Karma Wangmo,
  • Lungten Lungten,
  • Pema Wangchuk,
  • Tshewang Gempo,
  • Kezang Jigme,
  • Karma Phuntshok,
  • Tenzinla Tenzinla,
  • Ratna B. Gurung,
  • Kinzang Dukpa

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02405-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Rabies kills approximately 59,000 people each year worldwide. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of rabies is important for instituting rapid containment measures and for advising the exposed people for postexposure treatment. The application of a rapid diagnostic tests in the field can greatly enhance disease surveillance and diagnostic activities, especially in resource poor settings. In this study, a total of 179 brain tissue samples collected from different rabies suspect animal species (113 dogs, 50 cattle, 10 cats, 3 goats, 2 horses, and 1 bear) were selected and tested using both rapid immunochromatographic kit and the reference standard fluorescent antibody test (FAT). We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of a rapid antigen detection test kit produced by BioNote, Inc. (Hwaseong-si, Korea) relative to a FAT for its fit-for-purpose for confirmation of clinical cases of rabies for early response and enhancing rabies surveillance. Results Among 179 samples examined in this study, there was a concordance in results by the rapid test and FAT in 115 positive samples and 54 negative samples. Test results were discordant in 10 samples which were positive by FAT, but negative (false negative) by rapid kit. The rapid test kit showed a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 85.9–95.6) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 93.4–100) using FAT as the reference standard. The positive and negative predictive values were found to be 100% (95% CI:96.7–100) and 84.4% (95% CI: 73.6–91.3), respectively. Overall, there was 94.4% (95% CI: 90–96.9) test agreement between rapid test and FAT (Kappa value = 0.874) with a positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement of 92 and 100%, respectively. Conclusions Our finding demonstrated that the rapid test kit (BioNote) can be used for rabies surveillance and confirming clinical case of rabies in animals for making rapid decisions particularly controlling rabies outbreaks in resource poor settings.

Keywords