Nuclear Fusion (Jan 2023)

Polarized fusion and potential in situ tests of fuel polarization survival in a tokamak plasma

  • L. Baylor,
  • A. Deur,
  • N. Eidietis,
  • W.W. Heidbrink,
  • G.L. Jackson,
  • J. Liu,
  • M.M. Lowry,
  • G.W. Miller,
  • D. Pace,
  • A.M. Sandorfi,
  • S.P. Smith,
  • S. Tafti,
  • K. Wei,
  • X. Wei,
  • X. Zheng

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/acc3ae
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 63, no. 7
p. 076009

Abstract

Read online

The use of spin-polarized fusion fuels would provide a significant boost towards the ignition of a burning plasma. The cross section for D + T → α + n, would be increased by 1.5 if the fuels were injected with parallel polarization. Furthermore, our simulations demonstrate additional non-linear power gains in large-scale machines such as ITER, due to increased alpha heating. Such benefits require the survival of spin polarizations for periods comparable to the particle confinement time. During the 1980s, calculations predicted that polarizations could survive a plasma environment, although concerns persisted regarding the cumulative impacts of wall recycling. In that era, technical challenges prevented direct tests and left the large scale fueling of a power reactor beyond reach. Over the last decades, this situation has changed dramatically. Detailed simulations of ITER have predicted negligible wall recycling in a high-power reactor, and recent advances in laser-driven sources project the capability of producing large quantities of ∼100% polarized D and T. The remaining crucial step is an in-situ demonstration of polarization survival in a plasma. For this, we outline a measurement strategy using the isospin-mirror reaction, D + ^3 He → α + p. Polarized ^3 He avoids the complexities of handling tritium, while encompassing the same spin-physics. We evaluate two methods of delivering deuterium, using dynamically polarized Lithium-Deuteride (with vector polarization P _V ^D of 70%) or frozen-spin Hydrogen-Deuteride (with P _V ^D of 40%), together with a method of injecting optically-pumped ^3 He (with 65% polarization). Pellets of these materials all have long polarization decay times (∼6 min for LiD at 2 K, ∼2 months for HD at 2 K, and ∼3 d for ^3 He at 77 K), all far greater than a plasma shot in a research tokamak such as DIII-D (∼20 s). Both species can be propelled from a single cryogenic injection gun. We review plasma requirements and strategies for detecting polarization survival. Polarization alters both fusion yields and the angular distribution of fusion products, and each of these provides a potential signal. In this paper we simulate a selection of shots with similar characteristics in a future high-T _ion H plasma, and find ratios of yields from shots with fuel spins parallel and antiparallel reaching 1.3 (HD + ^3 He) to 1.6 (LiD + ^3 He) over a wide range of poloidal angles. (A companion paper finds sensitivity to fusion product angular distributions as reflected in the pitch angles of protons and alphas reaching the plasma facing wall.)

Keywords