Comparison of Different Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Formulations in the Prophylaxis of Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative treatment modality, frequently used for patients suffering from haematological malignancies. In the last two decades, there have been multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs), review articles, and meta-analyses addressing the efficacy of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG) as a graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. Nevertheless, only a few aimed to compare the effectiveness of different r-ATG formulations. Since the last article we retrieved comparing different r-ATGs in GvHD prophylaxis dates back to 2017, we performed a systematic literature review of articles published since 2017 to this day, utilising PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and MEDLINE, with the main endpoints being prophylaxis of acute GvHD (aGvHD) and chronic GvHD (cGvHD). We subjected to scrutiny a total of five studies, of which four compared the differences between Thymoglobulin (ATG-T) and Grafalon (ATG-G), and one discussed the impact of ATG-T dose. Overall, cGvHD, aGvHD grades II–IV, TRM, OS, NRM, LFS, relapse, overall infections, and EBV reactivation do not seem to be affected by the type of utilised rATG. However, data on aGvHD grades III–IV, GRFS, moderate–severe cGvHD, and CMV reactivation is conflicting. Through our research, we sought to summarise the most recent findings concerning r-ATGs in allo-HCT, and provide insight into the differences between the targets and origin of various ATG formulations.

Keywords

• anti-thymocyte globulin
• acute graft-versus-host disease
• chronic graft-versus-host disease
• allogeneic stem cell transplantation
• thymoglobuline
• grafalon