Temporary Laser Inter-Satellite Links in Free-Space Optical Satellite Networks

Abstract

Laser inter-satellite links (LISLs) between satellites in a free-space optical satellite network (FSOSN) can be divided into two classes: permanent LISLs (PLs) and temporary LISLs (TLs). TLs are not desirable in next-generation FSOSNs (NG-FSOSNs) due to high LISL setup time, but they may become feasible in next-next-generation FSOSNs (NNG-FSOSNs). Using the satellite constellation for Phase I of Starlink, we study the impact of TLs on network latency in an NG-FSOSN (which has only PLs) versus an NNG-FSOSN (which has PLs and TLs) under different long-distance inter-continental data communications scenarios, including Sydney–Sao Paulo, Toronto–Istanbul, Madrid–Tokyo, and New York–Jakarta, and different LISL ranges for satellites, including 659.5 km, 1,319 km, 1,500 km, 1,700 km, 2,500 km, 3,500 km, and 5,016 km. It is observed from the results that TLs provide higher satellite connectivity and thereby higher network connectivity, and they lead to lower average network latency for the NNG-FSOSN compared to the NG-FSOSN in all scenarios at all LISL ranges. In comparison with the NG-FSOSN, the improvement in latency with the NNG-FSOSN is significant at LISL ranges of 1,500 km, 1,700 km, and 2,500 km, where the improvement is 16.83 ms, 23.43 ms, and 18.20 ms, respectively, for the Sydney–Sao Paulo inter-continental connection. For the Toronto–Istanbul, Madrid–Tokyo, and New York–Jakarta inter-continental connections, the improvement is 14.58 ms, 23.35 ms, and 23.52 ms, respectively, at the 1,700 km LISL range.

Keywords

• Network latency
• next-generation free-space optical satellite networks
• next-next-generation free-space optical satellite networks
• Starlink
• temporary laser inter-satellite links