Conventional vs. alternative biogas utilizations: An LCA-AHP based comparative study

Abstract

This study compares the performance and the environmental impacts of three biogas utilization processes: combined heat and power cycle, dimethyl ether production, and methanol production. The processes are evaluated based on key performance indicators and life cycle assessments. Results show that molar methane conversion in the reforming unit is 93% for both dimethyl-ether (DME) and methanol processes. Methanol reactor reports a per-pass hydrogen conversion of 21%. DME production achieves an 89% conversion rate. The chemical pathways exhibit a 33% molar conversion of COx, contributing to the conversion of CO2 into advanced chemicals. The environmental footprint is evaluated through a life cycle assessment. Biogas cogeneration has the lowest global warming potential since DME and methanol production processes are influenced by steam production and electricity intake from the national grid, which relies on fossil fuels. An analytic hierarchy process is employed to assess the overall performance of the processes. DME production performs best with a score of 39%, followed by cogeneration with 31%, and methanol production with 30%. Different case studies are examined by modifying the weight criteria for each impact category. The findings provide that cogeneration and DME technologies perform better in all the iterations.

Keywords

• Biogas utilizations
• LCA analysis
• AHP methodology
• Biofuel production
• Circular process