Cell Reports (Sep 2013)

Concurrent MEK2 Mutation and BRAF Amplification Confer Resistance to BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in Melanoma

  • Jessie Villanueva,
  • Jeffrey R. Infante,
  • Clemens Krepler,
  • Patricia Reyes-Uribe,
  • Minu Samanta,
  • Hsin-Yi Chen,
  • Bin Li,
  • Rolf K. Swoboda,
  • Melissa Wilson,
  • Adina Vultur,
  • Mizuho Fukunaba-Kalabis,
  • Bradley Wubbenhorst,
  • Thomas Y. Chen,
  • Qin Liu,
  • Katrin Sproesser,
  • Douglas J. DeMarini,
  • Tona M. Gilmer,
  • Anne-Marie Martin,
  • Ronen Marmorstein,
  • David C. Schultz,
  • David W. Speicher,
  • Giorgos C. Karakousis,
  • Wei Xu,
  • Ravi K. Amaravadi,
  • Xiaowei Xu,
  • Lynn M. Schuchter,
  • Meenhard Herlyn,
  • Katherine L. Nathanson

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.023
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 6
pp. 1090 – 1099

Abstract

Read online

Although BRAF and MEK inhibitors have proven clinical benefits in melanoma, most patients develop resistance. We report a de novo MEK2-Q60P mutation and BRAF gain in a melanoma from a patient who progressed on the MEK inhibitor trametinib and did not respond to the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib. We also identified the same MEK2-Q60P mutation along with BRAF amplification in a xenograft tumor derived from a second melanoma patient resistant to the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib. Melanoma cells chronically exposed to trametinib acquired concurrent MEK2-Q60P mutation and BRAF-V600E amplification, which conferred resistance to MEK and BRAF inhibitors. The resistant cells had sustained MAPK activation and persistent phosphorylation of S6K. A triple combination of dabrafenib, trametinib, and the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor GSK2126458 led to sustained tumor growth inhibition. Hence, concurrent genetic events that sustain MAPK signaling can underlie resistance to both BRAF and MEK inhibitors, requiring novel therapeutic strategies to overcome it.