Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (Nov 2023)

Dosimetric Comparison of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy Plans for Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer, Including Regional Lymph Node Irradiation

  • Xiuxiu Wu MD,
  • Jianghua Huang MD,
  • Xiao Lin MD,
  • Xingxing Zhang MD,
  • Huangping Lu BD,
  • Wei Sun MD,
  • Song Duan MD,
  • Juntian Shi MD,
  • Xiaobo Huang PhD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338231214449
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22

Abstract

Read online

Background To investigate the optimal radiotherapy plans for synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) patients receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), including regional lymph node irradiation (RNI). Methods For 10 SBBC patients who underwent bilateral mastectomy and received bilateral PMRT with RNI, 3 integrally optimized plans with a single isocenter were designed for each patient in this retrospective study: intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 9 fixed beams (9F-IMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with 2 pairs of half arcs (2F-VMAT), VMAT with 2 pairs of outer tangential arcs and 1 pair of 200-degree arcs (3F-VMAT). The paired t -test (in the case of normal variables) and Friedman's test (in the case of nonnormal variables) were applied to compare the planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) values of the 3 techniques. Results The 3 techniques provided adequate target dose coverage and comparable results for PTVs. For OARs, 3F-VMAT yielded the lowest mean or median values of the left lung (15.02 ± 1.57 Gy) and right lung (14.91 ± 1.14 Gy), heart (6.19 (1.96) Gy), coronary artery (15.96 ± 5.76 Gy) and liver (8.10 ± 2.70 Gy) which were significantly different from those of 9F-IMRT and 2F-VMAT. The percentages of volume at various doses ( V 5 , V 10 , V 20 , and V 30 ) of 3F-VMAT plans were also lower than or comparable with those of 9F-IMRT and 2F-VMAT. The monitor units (MUs) of 3F-VMAT were 31% higher than those of 9F-IMRT and comparable with those of 2F-VMAT; however, there were time savings and halved beam-on times (BOTs) compared to 9F-IMRT. Conclusions The 3F-VMAT plan yielded comparable target coverage compared with 9F-IMRT and 2F-VMAT, was superior in dose sparing of normal tissues and enabled shorter BOTs, improving treatment efficiency. In our research, 3F-VMAT was the optimal radiotherapy technique for SBBC patients receiving PMRT including RNI.