Using Non-Contrast MRA to Discriminate between Obstructive and Nonobstructive Venous Diseases of the Legs

Abstract

Background: Venous interventions of the legs are less predictable owing to a lock of objective tools. Methods: One hundred and twenty patients with lower extremity venous disease were evaluated anatomically using TRANCE MRI. Then, a QFlow analysis was performed in 53 patients with only one leg affected for hemodynamic evaluation. Those patients with complete QFlow were classified into obstructive and nonobstructive. Results: The QFlow—namely, stroke volume, forward flow volume, mean flux, stroke distance (SD), and mean velocity (MV) in the external iliac vein (EIV), femoral vein (FV), popliteal vein (PV), and great saphenous vein (GSV). The obstructed group had a shorter SD and lower MV in the EIV, EIV/FV, and GSV/PV (SD: p-values of 0.025, 0.05, and 0.043, respectively; MV: p-values of 0.02, 0.05, and 0.048, respectively). A good performance in discriminating obstructive venous disease was reported for SD in the EIV (area under the curve (AUC) = 67.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 53.2–82.7%), EIV/FV (AUC = 72.4%, 95% CI = 58.2–86.5%), and GSV/PV (AUC = 67.9%, 95% CI = 51.7–84.1%). The SD in the EIV, EIV/FV, and GSV/PV had the ability to discriminate between obstructive and nonobstructive diseases (p-values of 0.025, 0.005, and 0.043). The MV in the EIV, EIV/FV, and GSV/PV had ability to discriminate between obstructive and nonobstructive venous diseases (p-values of 0.02, 0.005, and 0.048). Conclusions: The SD and MV were lower for obstructive than nonobstructive disease in the EIV.

Keywords

• veins
• magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
• obstructive
• not contrast media
• MTS